BHABOOT SINGH v. SANDEEP VERMA
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: DINESH MEHTA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-12-13. BHABOOT SINGH v. SANDEEP VERMA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JD:51552] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Writ Contempt No. 753/2017 In S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9500/2016 Mangi Lal S/o Shri Moti Lal, R/o Brahmno Ka Mohalla, Bagar Borunda, Teh. Priparcity, District Jodhpur Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. S. k. Agarwal, Chief Secretary And Commissioner Of Department Of Transport Cum Chairman, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, R. s. r. t. c. Parivahan Marg, Jaipur 2. Kuldeep Ranka, Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, R. s. r. t. c. Parivahan Marg, Jaipur 3. Lal Chand Chandak, Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Depot Jodhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. H. S. Rajpurohit, Mr. Mukesh Vyas, Mr. S. K. Poonia, Mr. Sushil Solanki, Mr. Lokesh Mathur, Mr. Ramawatar Singh, Mr. Bhola Ram Chahar, Mr. S. S. Gaur, Mr. Jassa Ram, Mr. Dev Anand Solanki, Mr. Surya Prakash, Mr. Sukesh Bhati, Mr. Irfan Gauri, Mr. Papu Sangwa, Mr. Sangram Singh, Mr.
Om Prakash, Mr. Naveen Mohan Vyas, Ms. Kirti Pareek, Mr. Naresh Tak, Mr. Devendra Kumar Soni, Mr. Dinesh Kumar Ojha, Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi, Mr. Hanuman Singh, Mr. Jayram Saran, Mr. B. S. Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Harish Kumar Purohit Mr. Shashank Sharma Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi, AAG Mr. Suniel Purohit [2024:RJ-JD:51552] (2 of 6) [WCP-753/2017] JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 13/12/2024 1. Present contempt petition so also other petitions enlisted in the Schedule appended herewith which involve identical allegation and facts are being disposed of conjointly by this Common order. The Schedule shall be treated as part and parcel of the order instant. 2. Learned counsel for the parties submits that the cases be disposed of in terms of the order dated 10. 12. 2024 which this Court has passed in S. B. Writ Contempt Petition No. 1027/2018 : Dungav Ram Vs. Shri Raj Hans Upadhyay & Ors. 3.
The directions given in the case of Dungav Ram (supra) are reproduced hereinbelow for the sake of convenience and clarity:- “(i) All the retired employees [who had filed their claims pursuant to order dated 07. 05. 2024 passed in the case of Dungav Ram (S. B. Writ Contempt No. 1027/2018) or the order passed in the case of Tara Chand Panchal (S. B. Writ Contempt No. 1099/2019)] shall file their objection(s)/claim(s) for determination of their retiral dues and other benefits within a period of two months. (ii) The claims be filed in the office of the Chief Manager of their respective depot (from which depot the concerned employee has retired) in two sets. It will be required of the Chief Manager to give receipt of the claims so filed with seal and date. (iii) The Managing Director of the respondent – Corporation shall within two months from today [2024:RJ-JD:51552] (3 of 6) [WCP-753/2017] nominate one retired accountant or higher official (Retd.
) at each depot, to adjudicate the claims so filed. (iv) Such nominated retired employee shall work as an ‘Arbitrator’. (v) It will be required of the Chief Manager of each Depot to provide a befitting place where the Arbitrator can have his sitting/hearing. (vi) All the claims filed by the employees shall be sent to the Arbitrator, who shall fix the date of hearing as per his convenience under intimation to both the parties. (vii) It will be required of the respondent – Corporation to make entire service record of each of the employees, whichever is necessary for the purpose of determination of claim, available to the Arbitrator. (viii) An honorarium of Rs. 500/- shall be paid by each of the employees/claimants to the Arbitrator, while the Corporation shall also pay equal amount to him. (ix) Out of the amount mentioned in clause (viii) above, half of the amount (Rs. 250/-) shall be paid by both the parties to the Arbitrator at the time of first hearing. The remaining amount of (Rs.
250/- each) shall be paid by the parties immediately before the final award is passed by the Arbitrator. (x) The respondent – Corporation shall also be free to file its objections regarding the claim so lodged by the employees. (xi) The Arbitrator shall take summary proceedings and pass award indicating therein the claim wise details of the amount payable. (xii) With the consent of all the parties, it is hereby ordered that the determination so made [2024:RJ-JD:51552] (4 of 6) [WCP-753/2017] by the said Arbitrator shall be final and binding on all the parties. No legal remedy against such order shall be permissible to any party. (xiii) Once the amount is determined by the Arbitrator, it will be required of the respondent – Corporation to pay the same on the basis of the priority as given in the circular dated 03. 11. 2021 issued by the Corporation. (xiv) Needless to mention that in case of a deceased employee his wife or legal representative shall be free to pursue the claim. 4.
Notices of contempt are hereby discharged. 5. All the captioned contempt petitions stand disposed of with same directions as has been given in the case of Dungav Ram (supra). (DINESH MEHTA),J 388-Arun/- [2024:RJ-JD:51552] (5 of 6) [WCP-753/2017] Scheduled Item S. B. Writ Contempt S. No. Party Names Nos. Petition Nos. 751/2018 Sher Singh Vs Kuldeep 1 389 Ranka And Anr 915/2018 Chandgiram Vs Kuldeep 2 390 Ranka And Anr. 978/2018 Sohan Lal Vs Raj Hans 3 391 Upadhyay 1152/2018 Ram Swaroop Khichar Vs 4 392 Sanwar Mal Verma 1184/2018 Narsi Ram Vs Raj Hans 5 393 Upadhyay 1498/2018 Fateh Lal Kumawat Vs 6 394 Sanwar Mal Verma 199/2019 Heera Ram Vs Sanwar Mal 7 395 Verma 1107/2019 Sohan Lal Nai Vs Shri Sawar 8 396 Mal Verma 1218/2019 Ram Chandra Dahima Vs 9 397 Suchi Sharma 87/2020 10 398 Teja Devi Vs Alok 240/2020 Rameshwar Lal Sharma Vs 11 399 Alok 328/2020 12 400 Kump Dan Vs Naveen Jain 489/2020 Bhagwana Ram Choudhary 13 401 Vs Mr. Naveen Jain Hari Ram Jajra Vs.
168/2021 14 402 Rajasthan State Road Transport Corp. 303/2021 Bhudev Sharma Vs Shri 15 403 Rajeshwar Singh [2024:RJ-JD:51552] (6 of 6) [WCP-753/2017] 366/2021 Parvat Singh Vs Shri 16 404 Rajeshwar Singh 718/2021 Gopal Lal Kumawat Vs Mr. 17 405 Sandeep Verma 975/2021 Kundan Singh Vs Rajeshwar 18 406 Singh 136/2022 Kalu Ram Vs Mr. Sandeep 19 407 Verma 307/2022 Ramdhan Vishnoi Vs Shri 20 408 Sandeep Verma 350/2022 Pritam Kumar Vs Shri 21 409 Sandeep Verma 1196/2022 Dev Kishan Vyas Vs Shri 22 410 Nathmal Didel Gopal Singh Vs Shri 23 411 1/2023 Nathmal Didel Om Prakash Mehra Vs. Shri 24 122 643/2019 S. L. Verma Bhaboot Singh Vs. Sandeep 25 42 984/2022 Sharma
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.