M/S RONAK HARDWARE v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2026-06-26. M/S RONAK HARDWARE v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 04 Supp. List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 274 of 2026 Date of Decision: 26. 06. 2026 M/s. Ronak Hardware A proprietorial firm having its registered Office at 29A Cantonment, Near Anjalee Cinema Hall, Anjalee, Shillong-793001 and Represented by its proprietor Smti. Pinky Agarwala, aged about 48 years, wife of Bhagwati Agarwala, resident of Opposite Tender Child School, Barapathar, Shillong – 793002, Meghalaya. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110011. 2. The Central Public Works Department (CPWD), Represented by the Director General, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi – 110011. 3. The Chief Engineer, Central Public Works Department (CPWD), North Eastern Zone, Cleve Colony, Dhankheti, Shillong – 793 003, Meghalaya. …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. M. Nath, Sr. Adv.
with Mr. D. J. Kapil, Adv. Mr. M. Nath, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with Ms. M. Myrchiang, Adv. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Dr. N. Mozika, learned DSGI assisted by Ms. M. Myrchiang, learned counsel for the respondents today submits that the matter has since been rendered infructuous in view of the Corrigendum issued by the respondents, wherein the condition requiring 5 years of having an office in the NE region has been reduced to 3 years. 2. Mr. M. Nath, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. D. J. Kapil, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this view of this matter, the writ petition may be closed as he has since become an eligible bidder. 3. Copy of the Corrigendum is taken on board and made part of the record. 4. Matter accordingly stands closed and disposed of. Judge
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.