Skip to main content
LawSphereX

RITESH ORAON ALIAS SOMRA ORAON ALIAS RIYA ORAON v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Court: High Court of Jharkhand

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-15. RITESH ORAON ALIAS SOMRA ORAON ALIAS RIYA ORAON v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case...

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 9865 of 2020 ------ Ritesh Oraon @ Somra Oraon @ Riya Oraon … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. S. D. Munda, Advocate For the State : Mr. R. Vardhan, Addl. P. P. ------ Order No. 02 Dated- 15. 12. 2020 Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over. In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Ranchi GRP. S. Case No. 53 of 2018 registered under sections 385/435/427/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of Arms Act.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with co-accused persons sprinkled petrol on the JCB machine to set it to fire and they were the member of the Aman Sriwastav gang. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR and without holding any T. I. Parade, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 16. 07. 2020 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 16 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P. P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above named petitioner on bail.

Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Magistrate, Ranchi, in connection with Ranchi GRP. S. Case No. 53 of 2018 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. ) Sonu-Gunjan/

Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.