Skip to main content
LawSphereX

DEEPAK R RAJANI v. SMT BRINDA JITENDRA SHAH

Court: High Court of Karnataka

Bench: R. NATARAJ

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-12-11. DEEPAK R RAJANI v. SMT BRINDA JITENDRA SHAH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

- 1 - RFA No. 917 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 11 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 917 OF 2010 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. DEEPAK R RAJANI, S/O RAMACHANDRA RAJANI AGED 50 YEARS, NO. 301, III FLOOR, 'NEELKANTH', CORPORATION NO. 8, ANDREE ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027. 2. M/S. RAJANI BUILDERS A PROPRIETARY CONCERN REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR. DEEPAK R RAJANI NO. 301, III FLOOR, 'NEELKANTH', CORPORATION NO. 8, ANDREE ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. KRISHNA MOHANA REDDY C, ADVOCATE FOR Digitally signed SRI. S. SHAKER SHETTY, ADVOCATE) by MARKONAHALLI RAMU PRIYA Location: HIGH AND: COURT OF KARNATAKA 1. SMT. BRINDA JITENDRA SHAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT NO. 15/D, ABHILASHA 46, AUGUST KRANTI ROAD MUMBAI-400 036 REP. BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR. SURESH KUMAR SWAROOP CHAND JAIN 2. SRI PRAKASH R RAJAJI NAVJEEVAN CO. OP HSB, SDC LTD. , TH NO.

1/19, 5 FLOOR, LAMINGTAN ROAD - 2 - RFA No. 917 of 2010 MUMBAI 6926786 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P. N. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 SERVED, UNREPRESENTED) THE RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07. 04. 2010 PASSED IN OS. NO. 15596/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE IV- ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYO HALL UNIT, BANGALORE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT OF THE PERMANENT INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL JUDGMENT A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the appellants stating that the parties have settled the dispute and therefore, the appellants do not want to press the appeal. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE BKN/List No. : 2 Sl No. : 4

Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.