Mohd. Abdul Hameed v. The State of Telangana,

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO

Judgment date: 2026-04-22

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-22. Mohd. Abdul Hameed v. The State of Telangana,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[ ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6162 OF 2026 Between: 1. Mohd. Abdul Hameed, S/o. Ghalib Mohd Abdul Sayeed, aged about 26 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, R/o. H. No 18-8-208/6, Riyasathnagar, Hyderabad. 2. Mohd. lshaq, S/o. lvlohd. Osman Javeed, aged about 28 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, R/o. H. No. 18-1-514/lVN/5, Naseeb Nagar, Poolbagh, Hyderabad. 3. t\/ohd. Abdul Sameed, S/o. Ghalib tt/ohd. Abdul Sayeed, aged about 27 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, R/o. H. No. 18-8-208/6, Riyasathnagar, Hyderabad. . Petitioners/Accused-1 to 3 AND 1, The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. RespondenUComplainant 2, Mohd. Jaffar Hussain, S/o. lVlohd. Hyder Hussain, aged about 53 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H. No. 18-8-197/1, Riyasath Nagar, Santosh Nagar, Hyderabad- 500059. ...

RespondenUDefacto-Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to and in connection with C. C No 15605/20. 19 on the file of the Vll Additional Chief Metropolitan lVlagistrate, Hyderabad, and quash the same against the petitioners herein. l. A. NO: 2OF 2026 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in lhe crrcumstances stated in the l\/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in C-C-No.. 15605/2019 on the file of the Vll Additional Chief lvletropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, pending disposal of quash petition. i I t ":"i'. :r. ' Thrs Petrtion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Crrmrnal Petttion and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Eluri Kalyan Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri Mohd.

[/oin Ahmed Quadrr, Advocate for the Petttioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No 1 and none appeared for the Respondenl No 2 The Court made the following: ORDER l l i l l I I t I ! l I i i i I I I t I I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT TTYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 6162 oI 2o26 Datel. 22. o,4. 2o26 Between: Mohd. Abdul Hameed and 2 others .... Pe titioners/ Accused No. 1 to 3 AND The State of Telangana, through its Public Prosecutor, and another. Respondents ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been hled by the petitioners/ accuscd Nos. 1 to 3 seeking quashing of C. C. No. 156O5 of 2O I 9 on the hle o[ VII i Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, for the offences ; under Section 324 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 186O. I 2. Heard Eluri Kalyan Kumar, learned counsel, representing Mr. I I Mohd.

Moin Ahmed learned counsel for the petitioners and I Quadri, I I I Mr. Jithendar Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor t appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1. I I t ! 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have hled an application before the learned trial Court in C. C. No. 156O5 of 2Ol9 for seeking discharge for the offences levelled against the petitioners. The said apptication is pending and the learned trial Court is adjourning the matter from time to time, without any valid reasons. Unless this Court issues necessary directions, the parties will be put t() great hardship. 4. Though the present Criminal Petition has been hled seeking quashing of the proceedings, learned counsgl for the petitioners requested lhis Court to issue necessary direction to the learned trial Court for expeclite disposal of the application hled by the petitioners. 5.

Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court without expressing arry view on the merits of the case, directs the learned of VII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, to dispose of the application filed by the petitioners, seeking discharge for the offences levelled against them in C. C. No. 15065 of 2019, as expeditiously as possible, within a period of two (O2) months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. The parties in the lis are directed to cooperate with the trial Court without seeking any undue adjournment. 6. With the above said direction, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/. NAYANI CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1.

The Vll Additional Chief [\iletropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad 2 The Statron House Officer, Santoshnagar Police Station, Hyderabad City' 3 Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad tourl _, 4. One CC to Sri t\/ohd. lt/orn Ahmed Quadri, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies GNK/SA Y*- HIGH COURT DATED: 2210412026 \ ORDER CRLP. No. 6162 of 2026 ':,1 ) -r lt,:l s (r' ' t= :, i,! - \, rJ. r-,. ' - ,... 1 ( DISPOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION . "C4 4, J i t fr#" t I

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.