Madan Mohan Dubey v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2025-07-28. Madan Mohan Dubey v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13876 of 2016 ====================================================== Sunil Kumar, S/o Madan Mohan Dubey, Resident of Village-Karatola, Dubey Bigha, P. S. -Obra, District-Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 2. Deputy Collector Land Reforms Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad. 3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad. 4. Circle Officer, Obra, District- Aurangabad. 5. Kanti Devi, W/o Dhaneshwar Rawani R/o Village Post- Kara, P. S. - Obra, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 28-07-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner, though the State is present. 2.
The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “(I) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the entire proceeding initiated in BASGIT PARCHA Case No. 01/2016-17 by the respondent no. -4 Circle Officer Obra on the petition filed by the respondent no. -5 against the petitioner only with a view to grab the purchased land of the petitioner by Patna High Court CWJC No. 13876 of 2016(3) dt. 28-07-2025 2/2 registered sale deed situated in Khata no. -5 plot no. 234 and 235 area 02 decimal Mouza Kara, thana no. -311 District-Aurangabad. (II) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamous directing the to respondent authorities stop the proceeding of the aforesaid case then and there till the disposal of the writ petition. (III) To grant any other relief/ reliefs to which the petitioner may be found entitled too in the facts and circumstances of the case. ” 3.
Be that as it may, since no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.