YALLAPPA S/O MALLAPPA ALLIMATTI v. NINGAPPA S/O: HANAMAPPA TATTI,
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: C.M. POONACHA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2024-06-12. YALLAPPA S/O MALLAPPA ALLIMATTI v. NINGAPPA S/O: HANAMAPPA TATTI,. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD TH DATED THIS 12 DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. M. POONACHA RSA NO. 100262 OF 2020 BETWEEN: YALLAPPA S/O MALLAPPA ALLIMATTI @ KAINAKATTI, AGE: 71 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KADARAKOPPA, TQ: BADAMI. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. S. S. YADRAMI, ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT) AND 1 . NINGAPPA S/O: HANAMAPPA TATTI, AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 2 . SMT. TULASAVVA W/O: BASAPPA TATTI, AGE: 72 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 3 . SMT. RUKMAVVA W/O HANAMAPPA TATTI, AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 4 . MUTTAPPA S/O: BASAPPA TATTI, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 5 . RAMAPPA S/O. BASAPPA TATTI, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 6 . SMT. KASTUREVVA W/O: VITHAL GAJAPPANAVAR, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, ALL ARE RESIDENT OF KAINAKATTI, TQ: BADAMI 7 . SMT. YANKAVVA W/O: TULASIGERI CHABBI, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: YADAHALLI, TQ AND DIST: BAGALKOT. 8 . SMT.
LAXMAVVA W/O: LAXAMAPPA GAJJAPPANAVAR, AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KUNDARAGI, TQ: BILAGI. ... RESPONDENTS RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD. 06. 12. 2019 PASSED IN R. A. NO. 30/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, BADAMI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD. 31. 07. 2018, PASSED IN OS. NO. 319/2011 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, BADAMI, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR DECLARATION OF OWNERSHIP AND FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING; O R D E R “Although the order dated 19. 03.
2024 states that failure to comply with the office objections within the time stipulated will result in the dismissal of the appeal, in view of the fervent plea made by the learned counsel for the appellants, a week’s time is granted to comply with the office objections, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1,000/- to the Advocate’s Library Fund, High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad, making it clear that if cost is not paid and the office objections are not complied with within one week, the above appeal shall automatically stand dismissed without further orders from this Court. ” SD/- JUDGE //COPY// Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 08/08/2024. Counsel for the appellant has not complied with the office objections at Sl. No. 1 to 8 and has not filed the memo a/w cost paid receipt. Hence, this RSA No. 100262/2020 stand dismissed without further orders from this Court as per the Court Order dated 12. 06. 2024. SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.
R- By:-rv C- By:-jm T- By: - cnb
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.