SHANKAR DAYAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-01-29. SHANKAR DAYAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2025:RJ-JD:5701] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2928/2025 Shankar Dayal S/o Late Shri Hardayal Singh, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Ratanpura (Nyangal), Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector Cum Chairman Of Plpc, District Hanumangarh. 3. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. 4. Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti, Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. 5. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Nyangal, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. 6. Tehsildar (Revenue), Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. 7. Shankar Lal S/o Late Ranjeet Gosain. 8. Vivek Kumar S/o Shankar Lal Gosain. 9. Jaipan S/o Late Shri Jile Singh Gosain. 10. Satveer S/o Late Shri Hanuman Ram Kumhar. 11. Ishwar Kargval S/o Late Shri Ramkumar Kargval. 12. Chandgi Ram S/o Late Shri Amruram Gosain. Respondents No.
7-12, Residents Of Village Ratanpura (Nyangal), Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. 13. Swami Karunand Ramtalai Dham Bhadra, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. 14. Swami Shyamanand Ramtalai Dham Bhadra, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. 15. Sushil Bhardwaj, Bhardwaj Photocopy, In Front Office Of Tehsil Bhadra, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. D. Goswami. [2025:RJ-JD:5701] (2 of 2) [CW-2928/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 29/01/2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred an application before the respondent No. 2- District Collector, Hanumangarh who is Chairman of the Public Land Protection Cell, Hanumangarh for removal of the encroachments existing at Khasra No. 122 & 127 of Village Ratanpura District Hanumangarh. He submits that the respondent No.
2- District Collector, Hanumangarh may be directed to decide the application preferred by the petitioner at the earliest. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2- District Collector, Hanumangarh who is Chairman of the Public Land Protection Cell, Hanumangarh to decide the pending application of the petitioner at the earliest by taking appropriate action in the matter. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 231-Anil Singh/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.