LawSphereX

GUNTAKA. MOHAN v. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd,

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: A.ABHISHEK REDDY

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-22. GUNTAKA. MOHAN v. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd,. Read the...

Judgment text

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PE TITION NO: 2 3510 0F 2020 Between: Padma years' Occ Business R/o 1-8-70112 Guntaka Mohan, S/o. G. Rajan, Age 72 Colony, Nallakunta, HYderabad' ... PETITIONER AND Rep of Telangana State Ltd" by its 1. The Southern Power Distribution Company 6-1-50' Mint cr,iiir"i. '". 0 r,rrjniging oi;"to' hivihg iG Corporate office at Compound, HYderabad 5000063 rssPDCL' 2 i#'$#;;i;;;i;g Engi"""iop"ration, GHYD central circle Hvderabad. sE/oP/GHYD 2 (op), Barkathp-ura sub Division it""n. ri! iu"t Divisionat Engineer rssPDCL. HYDERABAD' d;i; c;;i; Slttio" AisiiJnterhuti-ss rvun[ipjt Corporation, Rep by the Commissioner' 4 iil'bieit"r. -HtJeianao Near Tank Bund, Hyderabad. ...

RES'ONDENTS PetitionunderArticle226oflheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe the High court may be pleased to tne ariJavit filed therewith, circumstances stated in Oireliion more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF issue it a writ order or to the to 3 to piovide electricity connection MANDAMUS directing tne rlsfonAents 1 H. No. 1_8-701/2/1 and 1-8-7oi't213 and 1-8-70112t5 and 6 0n Plot No. 3 admeasuring 3360 Sqft (ground floor)with iid Sq. vutot or 601. 92 sq. ,iit *t' t-qll{[9'9':f at Padmanagar floor and 3030 sft in 2nd floor situated printn JrL, of 3030 sft on ]s district Hyderabad Sub of Hyderabad registration 6oio. v *0"|. tVlunicipal corporrtion bJ*J"O ny ruortfr 30-rojq' South Plot No'6 of B' Venkata District Chikkadpally and Narasaiah (H. No. 1-8-7011, lrtt-irot'No 4 of G Rajam (H No 1-B-701/2)' West Plot insisting 1-8-701/3) With out upon occupancy f. f i d. Krishnamurthy (H. No fit and ". "f p"nding disposal of main writ petition and deem certificate from 4th r".

pono6ni of the case proper in the circumslance IA NO: 1 0F 2020 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedinthe pleased to petition,'tne Ulgh Court may be dire^ct the affidavit filed in support ot if,e and 1'8-7011213 and 1o tne HINo t-8-701t2t1 respondents to provide prot ";il"iiy 720 Sq. yards or 601'92 Sq'mtrs with a 1-8-701t2ts and O on r. roiiimeasuring witiiplhth area of 3030 Sft on 1st floor and pfrtf. r"ri"" sgoO Sq. ft tgio,n4ioo'l "f padmanagar colony under Municipal corporation of 3O3O Sft in 2nd floor situat;J at by District Chikkadpally and bounded dis;;iHyderabgdtub Hyderabad registration ptot (H. No. 1-8-701 East Plot tto. o tf B. venkata Narasaiah ),. North 30 road, South Krishnamurthy West Plot No' 2 ol G' No. 4 of G. Rajam tfr. No. f-a-ZOf12) from 4th respondent r. ro. i_a_7or lg)'wrthout insisting upon occupancy certificate iir-.

in deem fit ind proper the circumstance of pending disposal of maln ;;l;;iit""''"d the case SMT' THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Petitioner: FOR TSSPDCL t'tos"t to 3: SRI R'VINOD REDDY' SC Counsel for the ResponOeni No. 4: SRI PASHAM *-l:*S-T,? r? J' C. r.. "r for the Respondent ORDER The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 2351O of 2O2O ORDER: I leard the learned counscl for thc petitioner, Sri R. Vinod Reddy, the learned Standing Counsel appearing lor respondent Nos. 1 to 3, and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No. 4. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the Iearned counsel Ibr the petitioner has submitted that thc issuc: raised rn rhe prescnt urit petitior-r is squareh covercd bv thc ordcrs passed b1. this Court in W. P. No. 26085 ol 2018, d:rtcd 26. 07. 2O18, ar-rd W,[']. No. 6030 ol 202O, claLccl 20.

0'1 2020 'l'hc above said submission is nt>t rlisputed br. , the learned Standing Counsels appearing lor tht: respondcnts herein. ln vies' of the same and tor the reasons etlike in the order dated 26. O7. 2018, passed in W. l). No. 25085 o1 2O'l 8, rhe prcscnt Writ Petition is disposed of directing the rcspondents to release the power supply to the premises ol the petitioner, subject to compliance of the terms and conditions and on furnishing an undertaking to produce the Occupancy Certificare lrom the concerned Municipal Corporation, u,ithin a prescribed period, and ii no such Occupancv Certificate is produccd s'ithin such period, it is opcn to thc r-cspondr:nts to takc LrpprolfrilrL( . rcti(rtr, in accorcl:rncc u,ith lal . Themiscellaneouspetitionspending'ifany'shallstand closed, There shall be no order as to costs' SD/-T. KRISHNA KU ASSISTANT REGI R //TRUE COPY// SECTI OFFICER To, 1.

The Chairman and lvlanaging Director, Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd, having its Corporate office at 6-'1-50, Mint Compound, Hyderabad 5000063. 2. The Superintending Engineer Operation, GHYD Central Circle TSSPDCL, Hyderabad. 3. The Assistant Divisional Engineer (OP), Barkathpura Sub Division SE/OP/GHYD Central Circle Section AE Shankermutt-59 TSSPDCL HYDERABAD. 4. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad lVunicipal Corporation, Near Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 5. One CC to Smt. Thakur Roopa Singh, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri R. Vinod Reddy, SC for TSSPDCL, Advocate IOPUC] 7. One CC to Sri Pasham Krishna Reddy, SC for GHMC, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CD Copies (Along with a copy of order dl:261O7120'18 in W. P. No. 26085 of 2018) sn] h\y HIGH COURT DATED22l1212020 ORDER ol 2020 WP. No. 23510 SI4 1HE 14: ( oi + o o nl JAit2021 'v t Cr:^^ t\7 ,\ . OF THE WP DISPOSING COSTS WITHOUT ,^\)0 aq ,Ar'u- RAO THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. S. RAMACI{ANDRA of 2O1B WRIT PDTITION No.

2 608 5 ORDER: Sri R' Vinod Reddy' Heard counsel for the petitioner, Power for State Southern Standing Counsel Telangana appearing for respondents Distribution Corporation Limited, . lto3,ar. rdSriL. Venl<ateshwarRao,standingCounselfor for Corporation' appearing 4th Greater Ilydcrabad Municipal rcspon clc I-t t. 2. It is statecl by learned cotttlse I allpearir-rg for tl-re Recldy, Standing counsel e tl tr oll cr as rvell trs Sri R. Vir-rocl l) issuc irr this Nos' I to 3 tl-rat tl're appe arirrg for rcspotlrlcllt by the order of tl-ris Court Writ Pctitiotr rs covered dt. 23. O3. 2018 in W. P'No. 9789 of 20la' 3.

Therefore for reasons alike, this Writ Petition is also respondents to release the clisposed of with a direction to the the premises of the petitioner subject to pou,er supply to tl-re and on furnishing at-t compliance of the terms and conditions procluce undertal<ing to the occupancy certilicate from the concertted Mur-ricip:il Corporation within a prescribecl period' iurcl ii no sucll occullancy certificatc is procluced rvithir-r surch period, it is open t. o the respolrclelrts 1o tal<e appropriate orcler trr larv Tl-rere shall ile tlo as i'rction itr accorcli'tttcc '"r'i1h COSTS ) petitions pending' if any' 4. Consequently, miscellaneous shall stand dismissed. RAO' J M. S. RAMACHANDRA 26th July, 2018' gra

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.