THEJAO SEKHOSE v. UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAKHETO SEMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-05-14. THEJAO SEKHOSE v. UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC020001352024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I. A. (Civil)/33/2024 THEJAO SEKHOSE S/O LATE KEDUOKIETUO SEKHOSE PERMAMEMNT ADDRESS- KENUOZOU COLONY, NORTH BLOCK, WARD-3, T. KHEL , KOHIMA VILLAGE PRESENT ADDRESS- TSURU COLONY, SECU ZUBZA, KOHIMA NAGALAND VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ROAD, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI- 110001 2:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED(NHIDCL) 3RD FLOOR PTI BUILDING 4-PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI 3:THE GENERAL MANAGER NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED (NHIDCL) PROJECT MONITORING UNIT- DIMAPUR 1ST FLOOR H/NO-63 (A) NST COLONY BEHIND CITY TOWER DIMAPUR NAGALAND 4:THE STATE OF NAGALAND REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND Page No.
# 2/3 KOHIMA NAGALAND 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOHIMA NAGALAND 6:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL) SECU ZUBZA KOHIMA NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : NEITEO KOZA Advocate for the Respondent : CGSC BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAKHETO SEMA ORDER Date : 14-05-2024 Heard Mr. Jai, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Kekhriengulie, learned counsel for the opposite party/writ petitioner in the connected main writ petition, Mr. Sentiyanger, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 to 3 and Mr. Imti Imsong, learned Addl. Advocate General for the respondent No. 4, 5 & 6. This application has been filed to strike off the applicant as the respondent No. 7 from the array of the respondent in the connected W. P. (C) No. 94/2022. Mr. Kekhriengulie, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Senityanger, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, 2 & 3 and Mr. Imti Imsong, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4, 5 & 6 has no objection for striking off the name of the respondent No.
7 from the array of the respondents. The applicant is accordingly struck of as the respondent No. 7 in the W. P. (C) No. 94/2022. Registry to make necessary correction in the cause tile of the connected writ petition. Page No. # 3/3 I. A. (C) stands disposed. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.