ABHI COKE PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 8 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2024-05-06. ABHI COKE PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 8 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
Serial No. 20 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 127 of 2024 Date of Decision: 06. 05. 2024 Abhi Coke Private Limited A company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and having its Head Office situated at G. S. Road, Police Bazar, Shillong 793001 and its Factory at Mukhep Ladrymbai, East Jaintia Hills District, Khliehriat, represented by Mr. Yuvraj Sharma, General Manager of the Petitioner Company :::Petitioner -Vs- 1. The State of Meghalaya represented by the Chief Secretary of the Government of Meghalaya, Main Secretariat Building, Shillong-793001 2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest Meghalaya Forest Head Quarter, Sylvan House, Lower Lachumiere, Shillong – 793001 3. The Secretary Government of Meghalaya, Mining and Geology Department, Shillong 4. The Chairman, Meghalaya State Pollution Control Board, Forest & Environment Department, “ARDEN”, Lumpyngngad, Shillong – 793014 5.
The Member Secretary Forest & Environment Department, “ARDEN”, Lumpyngngad, Shillong – 793014 6. The Deputy Commissioner, East Jaintia Hills District, Khliehriat 7. The Under Secretary Government of Meghalaya, Mining and Geology Department, Shillong 8. The Managing Director Meghalaya Industrial Development Corporation Limited, Shillong, Meghalaya 9. The General Manager District Industrial & Commerce Centre, East Jaintia Hills, Khliehriat :::Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Dr. A. Saraf, Sr. Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Kumar, AG with Mr. A. Kharwanlang, Addl. Sr. GA. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc. : ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No Oral: Dr. A.
Saraf, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that due to a recent development, whereby they have received notice from the State Pollution Control Board, he prays that he may be allowed to withdraw this instant writ petition, with liberty to file afresh, if so advised. Prayer is allowed. Matter accordingly stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal, however, with liberty granted as prayed. Judge Meghalaya 06. 05. 2024 “D. Thabah-PS”
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.