Skip to main content
LawSphereX

K.Chandrasekhar, v. The State of Telangana,

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: K. SARATH

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-03-23. K.Chandrasekhar, v. The State of Telangana,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[ 3302 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH I WRIT PETITION NO: 12661 OF. 2024 i Between: K. Chandrasekhar, S/o. K. Bhoomaiah, Aged 53 years, Occ. Record Assistant(Now g! "r compulsory Retirement), fuo. H. trto. 9-z-22113, Golla Basti, Lunger House, Hyderabad .. PETITIONER AND 1. The state of relangana, Represented by its principal secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat Bui lclings, Hyddrabad. 2. The Director, Telangana State Archives an? ite6earch lnstitute, Tarnaka, Hyderabad 3. The Assistant Director, Telangana State Archives and Research lnstitute, Tarnaka' Hyderabad ... RES'. NDENTS Fetition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed .

therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more so in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the impugned Order of Compulsory Retirement vide No. 2343/Esttl2O22 dt. 17. 1. 2024, passed by the 2nd respondent, without following the procedure contemplated for imposing of major punishment as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the sane and reinstate the petitioner into service. : lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to-direct the respondents to reinstate the pe*itioner into service by suspending the operation of the lmpugned Order of Computsory Retirement vide Proceedings No. 2343/Esltl2022 dt. 17. 1 . 2024, passed by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the Main tA/rit petition. Counselfor the Petitioner: SRI MD.

AJMAL AHMED Counselfor the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES-I The Court ntade the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAI{A AT I{YDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH UIRIT PETITION No. L266t of 2o. 24 THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 20. 26 I Between: I K. Chandrasekhar. . Petitioner f ( AND The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretar"jr, Higher Education Department and others. . Respondents ORDER: Sri Md. AjmaI Ahmed, Iearned counsel for the petitioner on record, filed a letter dated 09. 03. 2026 in the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition in case of non-payment of benefits under the impugned proceedings No. 2343 Estt 2022 dated L7 . O1. 2024. / / 2. Accordingly, permission is granted as sought for.

This Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition in case of non-payment of benefits under the impugned proceedings No. 2343 /Estt/2O22 dated 17 . O1. 2024. : !. I I I I I 3- Misc,ellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stan,C. closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. C. DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c ,/TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER I To 1. One CC to SRI MD. AJMAL AHMED, Advocate loPUcI 2. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-|, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderrabad. IOUTI 3. Two CD Copies t PSK. il t CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED:2310312026 6l ':r. lG l': ORDERI t WP. No. 12661 o12024 tJ z 2 5 ltlnR 20ffi I * * .. -^ lr'.. ,\ "1 " -,. , DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WTHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS @), ;rcg))a V}

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.