Galli Anthon Reddy v. State of Telangana and 3 Others
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-10. Galli Anthon Reddy v. State of Telangana and 3 Others. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[ 33021 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRl JUST]CE K. SARATH WRIT PETITIO N NO: 3651 oF 2022 Between: Galli Anthon Reddv. S/o: Galli Show Reddy, Aged about 70 vears. Occ. Business, Rl/o. ' H. N0. 2-152, snatrgouraram Mandal, ltukulu iahad, Nalgonda - 5082 10. ... PETITIONER AND 1. j"l? g:Sl*S"1Li; its P ri n c i pa I s e c reta ry, D e p a rtm e nt or R:XtSfi lill? 1tv 2 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. J The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendra Nagar Division, RR District. 4 The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0t the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of the Respondent No. 3, 4 a and their sub-ordinates in interfering and trying to remove the fencing stones in respect of his prot No. '181, admeasuring 265 Sq. yds in Sy. No. 36/24, situated at Phase ll, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from her prot without issuing any notice or without fofiowing due process of law, is iflegar, arbitrary, violative or Articre 14, 21 and 300-4 of the constitution of rndia and consequenfly direct the Respondent No. 3,4 and their sub-ordinates not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of her prot No. i81, admeasuring 265 sq.
yds, comprised in Sy. No. 36/24, situated phase at il, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingam: tlly Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without following due process of law and witl- :ut issuing notice. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 '15'l Petition under Section CPC praying that in the , ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co I t may be pleased to direct Respondent No. 3 and 4 and their sub-ordinates nct to interfere with the possession of the Petitioner in respect of her Plot No. 1€ 1, admeasuring 265 Sq. yds, comprised in Sy. No. 36/24, situated at Phase ll, Vir ayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally IVIandal, Ranga Rerr dy District, without following due process of law and without issuing any notice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ESLAVATH RAJU : Counsel forthe Respondents: SMT. S. SRAVANTHI, AGP )R REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER a IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.
SARATH II/RIT PETITION No. 3651 OF 2022 (DATED, THIS, THE 1OTH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2O25I Between: Sri Galli Anthon Reddy ,.. Petitioner AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & three others. ... Respondents ORDER: Heard Sri Eslavath Raju, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Smt. S. Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition seeking to declare \1 -sr(,J the action of respondent Nos. 3, 4 and their r ubordinates in interfering with and attempting to remove the lencing stones ln respect of petitioner's Plot No. 181, act-reasuring 265 Sq. yards 1n Sy. No.
36/24, situated at Phir;e II, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingar rpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and threatening to lispossess the petitioner from his plot, without issuing t-ry notice and without following due process of law, as illegiL ancl arbitrar5r 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner furth,: submits that while admitting the matter, this Court passc( . interim order dated 28. 01. 2022 with a direction to mairrt in status quo existing as on that date until the next dali of hearing in respect of the subject property. However, in s pite of lapse of more than three and half years, the responrl:nt authorities did not chose to file counter or vacate petiti: e denying the averments made by the petitioner in the wr-[ afhdavit.
In o SK,J view of the same, learned counsel requested this Court to allow the Writ Petition by directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect to the subject property without following due process of law. 4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that if the petitioner 15 1n \ possession of the subject property, the respondents will not interfere with the petitioner's possession of the subject propert5r, without following due process of law and requested this Court to pass appropriate orders. J I 5. In view of the submissions made on either side, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in Piot No. 181, admeasuring 265 Sq. Yards in Sy. No. 36 124, situated at Phase II, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, . x sr(,J Serilingampally Manda-l, Ranga Reddy t i ;trict, without following due procedure of 1aw.
There shall 1r r no order as to costs. 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendir. l IN this Writ Petition, shal1 stand closed SD/- A. t{ . GOWRI SHANKAR \ A\S TANT REGIST //TRUE COPY// N OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, State of Telangana' Departme tt of Revenue, T'S Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. t, RR District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendra Nagar Divisic 4. The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy I strict. 5. One CC to Sri Eslavath Raju, Advocate [OPUC] \ 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State r f Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies TJ I HIGH COURT DATED:1011212025 H IA \ _:) '. ,\ 2 tl [9' ORDER r,1 J. ll: WP. No. 3651 of 2022 FsB,ri a DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS le,b lr
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.