PURAN SAW ALIAS PURAN LALDHAN SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-14. PURAN SAW ALIAS PURAN LALDHAN SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 9710 of 2020 ------ 1. Puran Saw @ Puran Laldhan Saw 2. Chhoti Saw 3. Surendra Saw … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. S. Parveen, Advocate For the State : Mr. V. S. Sahay, Addl. P. P. ------ Order No. 02 Dated- 14. 12. 2020 Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioners personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over. In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present. The petitioners have moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Bagodar P. S. Case No. 153 of 2020 registered under sections 448/341/323/353/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were engaged in illegal construction work over the National Highway land and they abused and threatened the personnel of National Highway Authority of India though they have received full compensation. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 03. 09. 2020 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 1 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the trial of the case and also undertake that they will not go over or near the place of occurrence nor they will cause any hindrance in construction of the road by the National Highway Authority of India during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P. P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above named petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount st each to the satisfaction of learned J. M. 1 Class, Giridih, in connection with Bagodar P. S. Case No. 153 of 2020 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the trial of the case with further condition that they will not go over or near the place of occurrence nor they will cause any hindrance in construction of the road by the National Highway Authority of India during the pendency of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. ) Sonu-Gunjan/
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.