NIRAJ PRADHAN v. UNION OF INDIA
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: DINESH MEHTA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2020-12-08. NIRAJ PRADHAN v. UNION OF INDIA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13082/2020 Niraj Pradhan S/o Shri Indradev Pradhan, Aged About 35 Years, Working As A Sergeant, Trade CLK GD In 32 Wing, HRM Section, Air Force Station, Jodhpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of Defense, Raisina Hills, South Block, New Delhi 110011. 2. The Chief Of Air Staff, Air Headquarter Vayu Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi 110011 3. Air Officer Commanding, Air Force Record Office, Subroto Park, New Delhi- 10 4. Air Officer Commanding, No. 32 Wing, Air Force Station, Jodhpur C/o 56 APO ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmpal Singh Dhaka through Cisco Webex App JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Judgment 08/12/2020 1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the posting order dated 13. 11. 2020(Annex. 4), whereby the petitioner has been transferred from present Station to 825 Signal Unit, Air Force. 2.
While inviting Court’s attention towards the communication dated 17. 11. 2020, learned counsel submits that the competent authority has favourably recommended petitioner’s case for cancellation of transfer/posting order. (2 of 2) [CW-13082/2020] 3. Learned counsel submits that petitioner would be satisfied, if a direction is issued to the competent authority to decide his representation dated 17. 11. 2020, in accordance with law. 4. The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the direction to the respondent No. 3 to consider petitioner’s representation dated 17. 11. 2020, in accordance with law, within a period of seven days of placing certified copy of the order instant. 5. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner’s grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner. 6.
The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly. (DINESH MEHTA),J 87-Ramesh/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.