K.Niranjan Reddy v. The State of Telangana and 10 others
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-15. K.Niranjan Reddy v. The State of Telangana and 10 others. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
33021 [ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 792t4 OF 2022 Between: 1. K. Niranjan Reddy, S/o. K. Jaganmohan Reddy, Aged about 57 years, Occ ; Agriculture, Rl/o. H. No. 3-121A15, Bheem Reddy Nagar, Boduppal 500092. 2. K. Venkat Ramana Reddy, S/o. K. Jagan fVlohan Reddy, Aged about 48 years, Occ; Agriculture, R/0. H. No 3-121A,/5, Bheem Reddy Nagar, Boduppal 500092. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Dept, Secretariat building, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Special Tribunal, Nalgonda. 3. The District Collector, Nalgonda. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nalgonda. 5. The Tahsildar, Narketpally [r/andal, Nalgonda District. 6. S. Anjamma,. W/o. D/o. Parne Ramanarasamma, Aged about 75 years, Occ; House wife R/o.
Ammanabrolu Village, Narketpally IV'landal, Nalgonda District l 7. S. Polamma, W/o Gopal Reddy, D/o. Parne Ramanarasamma, Aged about 70 years, Occ- Housewife R/o. Tirumalgiri Village and lvlandal, Suryapet District. B. S. Jayamma, W/o Gopal Reddy, D/o. Parne Ramanarasamma, Aged about 69 years, Occ-House wife PJo Chervugattu Village, Narketpally Mandal, Nalgonda District. 9. T. Savitha, W/o Madhusudan Reddy, D/o. Parne Ramanarasamma, Aged about 68 years, Occ- Housewife Rl/o. Veldedi, Addagudur Mandal, Yadadri - Bhuvanagiri District. 10. Nallabelli Yadaiah, S/o. Achaiah, aged about 52 years, Occ-Agriculture, Rl/o. Venkatapuram Hamlet, Ammanabrolu Village, Narketpally Mandal, Nalgonda District. 11-Manda Lingaiah, S/o. Narasaiah, Aged about 50 years Vo. Venkatapuram Hamlet, Ammanabrolu village, Narketpally [Vlandal, Nal< onda District. .....
RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of Ini a praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, th,r High Court may be pleased to issue such appropriate writ or order or direction r ore particularly, in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari by calling for record in respect of case No. F2lS pl. Tri b unal I O981 I 2021 (Old case No. B I 1 028 I 2020 ) e rd consequently, set-aside the order dated 0410212021 passed by the 2nd Fl, spondent in in case No. F2lSpl. Tribuna1lO981l2O21 (Old case No. Bl 10281202C ) by directing the 4ih Respondent to dispose off the application of the Petitionerr father in accordance with law. l. A. NO:1 OF 2022 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the r;i c:umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court n: y be pleased to direct the Respondents to maintain status-quo with regard o the subject land admeasuring 4c. 2. 20 gts in Sy. No.
'1380, 1381 and 1417 o' Ammanabrolu village, Narketpally Village, Nalgonda District pending disposal of tf ( present writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : M/s L. VANI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 : SMT S. SRAVAN f ll, G. P FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 to 10 : - ) Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 1 : SRI P. KRISHNA KEE F TANA The Court made the following ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION No. 7944 OF 2022 DATED, THIS, THE 15TH DAY OF DECMEBER, 2025 Between: K. Niranjan Reddy and another ... Petitioners AND 1 The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue De partment, Secretariat, Hyderabad and ten others ... Respondents ORDER: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and Smt. S. Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the officia-l respondents and Ms. P.
Krishna Keerthana, learned Counsel appearing for the unofficia'l respondent No. 11 and perused the record. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the father of the petitioner made representation to the sK,.. r respondent No. 4/Revenue Divisional Offic:.. Nalgonda, for cancellation of Patta Certificates grantt:r I to the third parties in respect of the lands in Sy. Nos . ilg0, i38 1 and 1417 to an extent of Ac. 2. 2O gunt: s situated at Ammanabole Village of Narketpally Man: al under the Telangana Lald Reforms (Ceiling on Agricrr tural Holdings) Ar:t, i973 and the same u,as numbered as Appeal No. No. B/1028/2O1O. Subsequently, the ap::a1 filed by the father of the petitioner was transfer:t. r cl to Speciai Tribunal/Respondent No. 2, constitute<l under the provisions of Telangana Rights in Lalds ar-lr pattadar pass Book Act, 2O2O.
The Speciat TribunaI without any jurisdiction entertained the said appeal Lln: er ROR Act as the issue involved in the said appeal pertai t s to Telangana Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holcl:Lgs) Act, i973, secking for cancellation of patta certific: tes issued in respect of third parties though the subject trnds are not vested with the Government and therefor : the Special SK,J Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal hled by the father of the petitioner and requested to remand back the matter to the respondent No. 4. 3 The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and the learned Counsel for the respondent No. 11 fairly conceded that appeal filed by the petitioner before the respondent No. 4 do not come under the ROR Act and it pertains to Telangana Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 and requested to pass appropriate orders.
I 4 In view of the submission made by both sides, the l writ petition is disposed of by setting aside the impunged order dated O4. O2. 2O21 passed by Special Tribunal/respondent No. 2 in Case No'F2/Special Tribunal/O981. 2021 (Old Case No. B/ lO28l2OlO on the frle of Revenue Divisonal Officer, Nalgonda) and the matter is remanded back to the respondent No. 4/Revenue Divisional SI(,J Officer, Nalgonda for passing approJ) iate orders 1n . o accordance with law, after issuing notices the petitioner as well as the effected parties including r rsonal hearing. J No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pendi: e, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. . P. PONNA KRISHNA St) AS I ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' SECTION,OFFICER To Secretariat bLri Cing, Secretariat, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Dept, State of Telangana at HYderabad. 2. The Special Tribunal, Nalgonda. 3. The District Collector, Nalgonda. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nalgonda. District. 5.
The Tahsildar, Narketpally Mandal, Nalgonda \ for the Str te of Telangana at 6. t*o CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court Hyderabad. [OUT] 7. Ohe CC to I\//s. L. VANI, Advocate IOPUCI (() 8. One CC to SRI P. KRISHNA KEERTANA, Advocate 'lJC) 9. Two CD Copies SA ) HIGH COURT DATED:1511212025 s;1 I \ii: () :] O { I Jill lt 'i;r I -- r^n-1-^.. i'i' -:_ -,' . '-.!. - ;-- ORDER WP. No. 7944 ot 2022 DISPOSING OF THE W. P WITHOUT COSTS. lL\'
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.