KAMESHWAR ORAON v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. N. PATHAK
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-12-19. KAMESHWAR ORAON v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 6705 of 2024 ---------- Kameshwar Oraon, aged about 57 years, Son of Late Bisrai Oraon, Resident of Flat No. 2-A, Block B, Koyal Enclave, Burdwan Compound, P. O. -Lalpur, P. S. -Lalpur, Dist. -Ranchi, State-Jharkhand ………… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Cooperative Department, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, Doranda, P. O. - Doranda, P. S. -Doranda, Dist. -Ranchi 3. The Registrar, Cooperative Society, having its office at Animal Husbanry rd Building, 3 Floor, Hesag, Hatia, P. O. -Hatia, P. S. -Hatia, Dist. -Ranchi 4. The Joint Registrar (Audit), having its office at Block-B, Collectorate Building, P. O. -G. P. O. , P. S. -Kotwali, Dist. -Ranchi rd 5. The Deputy Registrar, having its office at Animal Husbandry Building, 3 Floor, Hesag, Hatia, P. O. -Hatia, P. S. -Hatia, Dist. -Ranchi ………… Respondents ------- CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. N.
PATHAK For the Petitioner : Mr. D. K. Dubey, Advocate Mr. Raju Koiri, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Mehta, AC to GA-VI ---------- 02/ 19. 12. 2024 Heard the parties. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that suffice it would be if a direction is given to the petitioner to file fresh representation for redressal of his grievances and thereupon, respondents may be directed to pass reasoned order on his representation within a stipulated period of time. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents very fairly submits that if this Court directs the petitioner to file fresh representation before the respondent-authorities, the respondents shall pass reasoned order on the same. 4.
In view of fair submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I hereby direct the petitioner to file fresh representation annexing all the relevant documents on which he is relying, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and after receiving the same alongwith the copy of this order, the respondents shall consider the grievances in accordance with law, taking into consideration the prevalent rules, guidelines and legal propositions and thereafter pass a speaking and reasoned order within a further period of three weeks which shall also be communicated to the petitioner. 5. It goes without saying that if the petitioner is found entitled for the benefits as prayed for, the same may be extended to him within a further period of two weeks. 6. With these observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. (Dr. S. N. Pathak, J. ) Rohit/-
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.