N T RAHAMATHULLA KHAN ASSOCIATES v. THE LABOR OFFICER
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: JYOTI M
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-12-11. N T RAHAMATHULLA KHAN ASSOCIATES v. THE LABOR OFFICER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 28248 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 11 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 28248 OF 2024 (L-PG) BETWEEN: N. T. RAHAMATHULLA KHAN ASSOCIATES, NO. 13/11, PAMPA MAHAKAVI ROAD, SHANKARAPURAM, BENGALURU - 560003. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ROSHAN GEORGE JACOB, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SAMPREET PAL, ADVOCATE) AND: THE LABOR OFFICER AND COURT OF CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972, DIVISION-6, Digitally signed KARMIKA BHAVAN, by THEJAS DAIRY CIRCLE, KUMAR N BANNERGHATTA ROAD, Location: HIGH BENGALURU - 560010. COURT OF …RESPONDENT KARNATAKA THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 2 - WP No. 28248 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Sri.
Roshan George Jacob, counsel for the petitioner appeared through video conferencing and seeks time to comply with the office objection. 2. This Court is not inclined to grant time. The petition is listed today for orders regarding the dismissal of the petition for non compliance with the office objection. 3. A perusal of the daily order sheet reflects that the petition was listed on 09. 12. 2025. On that day, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner appeared through video conferencing and sought time with the office objection. Taking note of the submission, time was granted as a last chance. As of today, office objections are not complied with. Hence, the writ petition is dismiss for non compliance with the office objection. 4. Resultantly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- compliance with the office objection. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No. : 2 Sl No. : 9
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.