SRI BASAVARAJU T N v. SRI. SWAMINATHA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-02-16. SRI BASAVARAJU T N v. SRI. SWAMINATHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 32474 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 16 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. R. KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 32474 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI BASAVARAJU T N S/O NATARAJU AGE ABOUT 43 YEARS BUSINESS AT R/O 31 ACRES AREA, DEVEGOWDA BADAVANE KADUR TOWN, KADUR TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 548. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. T S VENKATESH, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. SWAMINATHA S/O SRI ALAGIRIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS STONE BUSINESS Digitally R/O BENKI COLONY signed by KADUR TOWN, KADUR TALUK CHANDANA CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 548. B M …RESPONDENT Location: High Court THIS W. P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE of Karnataka CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN R. A. 5/2024 PENDING BEFORE HON’BLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. R. KRISHNA KUMAR - 2 - WP No.
32474 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The same reads as under: “The undersigned Counsel for the petitioner most humbly submits that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition with liberty to prefer Regular Second Appeal (RSA) in addition to exclude the time of proceeding pending before this Hon’ble Court, by considering protection under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 in the interest of justice and equity. ” 2. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to file Regular Second Appeal. 3. If such an appeal is filed by the petitioner, within a period of six weeks from today, the petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. 4. Registry is directed to return back the papers / documents to the learned counsel for the petitioner immediately without any delay. Sd/- (S. R.
KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE SV
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.