DURGA NAND AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2024-12-21. DURGA NAND AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition (T) No. 287 of 2024 Date of Decision: 21. 12. 2024 _____________________________________________________________________ Durga Nand and Ors. ……... Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another ….... Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Ms. Archna Dutt, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B. C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 20. 12. 2024, issued under the signature of Director (Elementary Education), Himachal Pradesh, learned Additional Advocate General states that mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed stands executed. 2.
Perusal of afore communication, which is taken on record, reveals that in compliance of judgment dated 6. 10. 2023, passed in CWPOA No. 1359 of 2019, case of the petitioners was examined by the Deputy Director of Elementary Education Solan, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh and total arrear amounting to Rs. 2,03,437/- has been calculated, however afore amount as per instructions issued by the Finance department vide letter dated 7. 1. 2012, has been proposed to be paid in two installments. One installment of Rs. 1,11,381/- has already been credited in the bank account of the petitioners. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings, accordingly, present petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate court of law qua surviving grievance, if any.
Needless to say, remaining amount as agreed to be paid shall be paid within stipulated time, failing which petitioners would be at liberty to get the present petition revived. December 21, 2024 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.