Satyanarayana Reddy v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: JUVVADI SRIDEVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-04. Satyanarayana Reddy v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAYOF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO:371 OF 2024 Between: Satyanarayana Reddy, S/o. Late Euchi Reddy, Aged. 51 years, Occ: Private job, R/o. H. No. 3-14-122/3, Plot No. 43, Road No. 5, Vivekananda Nagar Colony, Phase- ll, Monsoorabad, Ranga Reddy Dist. ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED AND 1 The State of Telangana, rep. by the public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad 2 Varikuppala Dasharatha, Wo Venkataiah, Aged. 30 Years, Occ: Mason, R/o. H. No. 17-1-3801121, D. S. Nagar, Vadderabasti, Hyderabad District ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash Crime No. 1132 of 2023 dated 12-10-2023 on the file of Madhapur Police Station, Cyberabad l. A. NO: 2OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.
P. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Crime No. 1132 of 2023 dated 12- 10-2023 on the file of Madhapur Police Station, Cyberabad This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S VIPLAV SIMHA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No. 2 The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD { THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No. 371 oI20U DATED: 04th ER. 2025 Between: Saty'anarayana Reddy Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor and Another ...
Respondents O R D E R: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitic,ner submits that during the pendency of the criminal petition to quash the crime, charge sheet has been filed and hence, the matter has become infructuous. Recording the aforesaid submission, this criminal petition is disposed of as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to petitioner(s) to challenge the charge sheet, if desires so. Perrding miscellaneous applications, if ? fly, shall stand closed. SD'-B. REKHA RANI Sraur REGISTRAR /TTRUE COPY'I SECTION OFFICER To, Magistrate at Kukatpaly' Cyberabad 1 The X Additional Metropolitan 2- The€tation House officer, Madhapur porice station, Madhapur, cyberabad 3. One CC to SRt S VtpLAV STMHA REDDY Advocate IOPUCI 4' Prosecutor, High court for the state of reransana at ',{? ""rff# i"13+i 5. Two CD Copies VM/PSL YK HIGH COUF:T DATED: 0411212025 \ \ ORDER CRLP. No. 3i"l of 2024 .
\t srA , z b 27JAil2o2l t) L t Or Si,N'iFi- DISPOSINGi THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS . "e '6 ftril"
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.