BIPINKUMAR NATWARLAL SHARMA v. STATE OF GUJARAT
Court: High Court of Gujarat
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DIVYESH A. JOSHI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Gujarat judgment dated 2024-02-06. BIPINKUMAR NATWARLAL SHARMA v. STATE OF GUJARAT. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
R/SCR. A/1626/2024 ORDER DATED: 06/02/2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1626 of 2024 (PAROLE LEAVE) ======================================================= BIPINKUMAR NATWARLAL SHARMA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ======================================================= Appearance: MSAKSHITABA SOLANKI(6782) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR DHAWAN JAYSWAL APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1-3 ======================================================= CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DIVYESH A. JOSHI Date : 06/02/2024 ORAL ORDER 1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for respondent – State of Gujarat. 2. By way of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed to release him on parole leave on the ground of financial assistance. In support of it, necessary documents are produced on record. 3.
I have heard learned advocates appearing for the parties and have also perused the documents produced along with the petition as well as considered the averments made in this petition including jail remarks. It is found out from the jail report that in past, the applicant was granted bail and he surrendered in time and his jail conduct is found to be good. Therefore considering the grounds mentioned and the averments made in the petition, the present petition deserves to be allowed. R/SCR. A/1626/2024 ORDER DATED: 06/02/2024 4. Therefore, the present petition stands allowed partly. The petitioner prisoner is ordered to be released on parole leave for a period of 15 (Fifteen) Days from the date of his actual release, on executing personal bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) before the Jail authority and on usual terms and conditions as may be imposed by the Jail Authority. 5. The petitioner shall surrender before Jail Authority on completion of parole leave, without fail. 6.
Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted. (DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J. ) Gautam
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.