Sri Gurram Ranga Reddy v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: T.MADHAVI DEVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-01. Sri Gurram Ranga Reddy v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
| 321s l IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRlT PETITION NO: 36496 OF 2025 Between: 1 Sri Gurram Ranga Reddy, S/o Gurram Narayana Reddy Aged ,q991. 5q years, Occ: Agriciulture, R/o H. No. 2-411, Chinnagu nd a velly Village, Siddipet Rural Mandal. Siddipet District. Sri Kothapally Ramachandram, S/o Late Narayana, Aged about 64 years' 2 '1-96, Oic: Agribulture, Fl/o H. No. Chinnagundavelly Village, Siddipet Rural lVIandal, Siddipet District. ... PETITIONERS AND Raj & 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Rural Developmenf Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Siddipet District. J The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Siddipet District. by its Chairman, Siddipet 4 Siddipet Urban Development Authority, Rep. Siddipet District.
A its Panchayat Secretary, The Chinnagunciavelly Gram Panchayat, Rep. by Chinnagundivelly Vilt'age, Siddipet RLral Mandal, Siddipet District Aged about 43 years, Occ 6 Sri Police Srinivas Reddy, S/o Narayana Reddy, Rural Ex-Army Employee, Rl/o-H. No. 1-94, Chinnagundavelly Village' Siddipet Mandal, Siddipet District. ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndra praying that in the circumstances-stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be '1 Respondent pleased the inaction of to . lssue a writ of Mandamus declaring 'Nlos.. 1 dated 1o. 12. 2024, to 5 in not considering the petitioners' representations and failing to take action 4. g. 2025.. 19. 09. 2025 21 . O9. 2025 and 06. 10. 2025 in against the illegal construction raised by Respondent No. 6 at House No.
'1 -94, Ciinnagundav"lty Villrg", Siddipet Rural tVlandal, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the ielangana Panchayat Raj Act, Building Rules, Articles 21 and 300-4 of the constitution of lndia 2. consequently direct Respondent Nos. 'l to 5 to take immediate action for removal of the encroachmer , illegal ramp, stairs, and projections constructed on the public road by Responrl nt ruo. 0. lA NO: 1 OF 202s Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in th€ lircumstances stated in the affidavit frred in support of the petition, ir,e Hign cc L rt may be preaseJ to direct Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to immediatery removar of th : iflegar unauthorised construction at H. No. 1-94, incruding ramp, stairs, and roac encr"oachment made by the 6th respondent, pending the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MALLA REDDy GADIPALI-. Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 to 3: Gp FOR PANCHA\1 rT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPIV ENT Counsel for the Respondent No. 5: SRI K. PRADEEP REDtr..
, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYATH Counsel for the Respondent No. 4 & 6: - - - - The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No. 36496 oF 2025 DATE: O1 . 12. 2025 Between: Sri Curram Ranga Reddy and another ... Petitioner AND The State of Telangana ty its principal Secretary, T"p Panchayat Raj & Rural Deveiopment Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & 5 others ... Respondents ORDER: In this u,rit petition, the petitioner is challenging the inaction on the part of the respondents to consider their representations dated 1O. 12. 2024, 04. Og. 2O2S, lg. Og. 2O2S, 21. 09. 2025 and 06. 1O. 2O2S and in taking action against rhe illegal constructions raised by respondent No. 6, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for panchayat Raj appearing fbr respondents No-1, 2 & 3 and Sri K.
Pradeep Reddy, learned St Lnding counsel for Gram Panchayat appearing for respondent No. i 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has drarl r the attention of this Court to page No. 13 of the u,rit papers, i. e , representation submitted by thc pctitioners with regard to illegr constmctions made by respondent No. 6. He further submitted tt at because the petitioners have complained, the unofficial respo rdents tried to ki1l the petitioners and a criminal case was also rr istered against 1 respondent No. 6 4. Learned Standing counsel appearing for Cram Panchayat submitted that lhc representations of the petiti: rers would be considered and appropriate action would be take r in accordance with law. 5. In vieu, thereof, this Court deems ht and t'oper to direct respondents No. 2 & 5 to consider the represer tations of the petitioners and take appropriate action thereon in accordance . , with law, after giving notice to unofficial spondents, if necessary.
The said exercise shall be complete 1 expeditiously, preferably u,ithin a period of four (04) r,r,eeks frc l the date of receipt of a copv of this ordcr 6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shali stand closed SD/-P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, '1 and Rural Development Department, . The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj The State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. District. 2 The District Collector, Siddipet Panchayat Raj officer, Siddipet District. 5. tn" Dirtri. t i. ih" Chrirran, Siddlpet Uiban Development Authority, Siddipet. Siddipet District. panchavat Secretary, The c ih; Chinnagund avelly Gram Panchayat. " Mandal, Siddipgt District. Chinnaqundlvelly Village, Siddipet Rural IVIALLA-REDDY GADIPALLY, Advoc-ate 6 o;; ci to snt [oP^U-cl-. . - . .. .
High ; i; ccr to cp FoR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELoPII/ENT, of Telangana. Court for the State [OUT] 8. Two CD CoPies BN BS (F- HIGH COURT DATED:01 11212025 ,. I --. ii j /. a ). . i. -. - L ,-. . )r -"r . 1. r. ,:. \ \' i ORDER ii L iti; Zffi ,f f ! i' .. ,,'| WP. No. 36496 of 2025 , ,',',. ,,,. '. ,. -. -.. -1,,i DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS (t wf h
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.