JIMMY MALHOTRA v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DIVISION
Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Bench: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Punjab and Haryana judgment dated 2026-04-24. JIMMY MALHOTRA v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DIVISION. Read the judgment...
Judgment text
Sr. No. 200 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1259412594-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision :Date of Decision : 24. 04. 2026 Jimmy MalhotraJimmy Malhotra …Petitioner Versus Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Division, MandiDeputy Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Division, MandiDeputy Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Division, Mandi Gobindgarh, District Fatehgarh SahibGobindgarh, District Fatehgarh Sahib …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBALDEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITAHON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITAHON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Mr. Shubham Bhardwaj, Advocate, for theor the petitioner. Mr. Mr. Sagar Ratusaria, Advocate, for the respondent. for the respondent. *** DEEPAK SIBALDEEPAK SIBAL, J.
(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, heLearned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, heLearned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction towould be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction towould be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the DeputyDeputyDeputy Commissioner, Commissioner, Commissioner, Central Central Central Goods Goods Goods and and and Services Services Services Tax Tax Tax Division, Division, Division, Mandi Mandi Mandi Gobindgarh, District Fatehgarh SahibGobindgarh, District Fatehgarh Sahib-the sole respondentrespondent to take a decision on the legallegal notice notice dated dated 11. 08. 2025 11. 08. 2025 (Annexure(Annexure P P-9), made on behalf of the petitioner. 2.
Learned counselLearned counsel for the respondent, who appears on advance notice,, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of theAccordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of theAccordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of wicase, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction toth a direction to the respondent to take a decision on thedecision on the legal notice dated 11. 08.
2025 (Annexure P(Annexure P-9), made on behalf of the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all affected partiesaffected parties, preferably within, preferably within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. py of this order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken beNeedless to add that the decision so taken beNeedless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner,and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner,and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law.
(DEEPAKDEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGEJUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI)(LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGEJUDGE April 24, 20266 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned :Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable :Whether reportable : Yes/No VANDANA 2026. 05. 01 11:40 Page 1 of 1 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.