DAINILLA SANGMA AND 2 ORS. v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 5 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2026-04-02. DAINILLA SANGMA AND 2 ORS. v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 5 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 56 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC[WP(C)]. No. 19 of 2026 in WP(C). No. 69 of 2026 Date of Decision: 02. 04. 2026 1. Smti. Dainilla Sangma, W/o Rengstone Marak, R/o. Alokdia Village, PS Tikrikilla, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. 2. Smti. Selony Ch. Marak W/o. Nemso Ch. Marak R/o. Alokdia Village, PS Tikrikilla, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. 3. Smti. Nethmy Momin, W/o. Albert N. Sangma R/o. Alokdia Village, PS Tikrikilla, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …Applicants -Versus- 1. State of Meghalaya represented by the Commissioner & Secretary, Community & Rural Development Government of Meghalaya. 2. The Deputy Commissioner & District Programme Co-coordinator MGNREGS West Garo Hills District Meghalaya. 3. The BDO(MGNREGS), Demdema C&RD Block, West Garo Hills, District Meghalaya. 4. Smti. Sonalin M. Sangma D/o. Pison Marak R/o. Alokdia P. S Tikrikilla, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. 5. Smti. Jenny A. Marak, D/o. Sundaybirth Sangma R/o.
Alokdia P. S Tikrikilla West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. 6. Smti. Menjit M. Marak R/o. Alokdia P. S Tikrikilla West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. P. T. Sangma, Adv. Ms. J. T. Sangma, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. A. Sheikh, GA for R 1-3. Ms. E. Pajuh, Adv. for R 4-6 i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Mr. P. T. Sangma, learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to some incurable defects, he prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant misc. application with liberty to file afresh. 2. The same is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Accordingly, the same is allowed and the misc. application stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal with liberty as prayed.
Judge Signature Not Verified 3 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026. 04. 02 17:57:50 IST
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.