B. Ramulu v. Gulam Sandani Soofi
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: G SRI DEVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-16. B. Ramulu v. Gulam Sandani Soofi. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI SECOND APPE AL NO: 174OF 2007 Appeal Under Section 100 of C. P. C. against the Judgment and decree daled 7 -12-2006 in A. S. No. 70 of 2003 on the file of the court of the vll Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC) Nizamabad at Bodhan preferred against the order dated 21-01-2002 in O. S. No. 98 of 't997 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Bodhan. Between: B. Ramulu, S/o. Sangaiah Advocate R/o. H. No. 1-4-877 Goshala Road, Bodhan, ... APPELLANT/ Appellant / Ptaintiff AND 1. Gulam Sandani Soofi, S/o. Late Shaik Mohinuddin Occ:Advocate R/o. Bodhan Town, Bodhan Nizamabad District. .. Respondent / Respondent / Defendant 2. Shamim Sab, S/o. Aziz Ul-Rahman, Occ: Busrness FYo. Lucky Automobiles, Besides Syndicate Bank, Bodhan, Nizamabad District. 3. Ahmed Sab, S/o.
Shaik Fareed Shabbu l\,4iya price @ Business- Fair Shop R/o. Narsi Road, Bodhan, Nizamabad District. 4. The Commissioner, IVunicipal Council, Bodhan, Nizamabad. 5. The Chairman, Municipal Council, Bodhan, Nizamabad. 6. llliraz, S/o. Goremiya R/o. Bodhan, Nizamabad District. ( Respondents 2,3,4, 5,6 not necessary in this Second Appeal ) ... RESPONDENTS/ Respondents / Defendant Nos. 2 to 6 Counsel for the Appellant: SRI M. V. S. SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 : SRt SERLA PAND. AR| (NOT APPEARED) The Court delivered the following: Judgment HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI ND AP NO. 17,+ OF o07 JUDGMENT: Sri M. V. S. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal and liled a letter dated 14 . 12. 2O2O to that effect. Permission is accorded. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There sha11 be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand dismissed. Sd/. C. V.
MALLIKARJUNA VARMA DEPUTY REGJSTRAR //TRUE COPY// fr,,' SECTI&. 1 OFFICER To l. The Vll Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC) Nizamabad at Bodhan (with records, if any) 2. The Junior Civil Judge, Bodhan. , Nizamabad District. (with records, ifany) 3. One CC to SRI M. V. S. SURESH KU[\4AR, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One cc to Sri Serla Pandari, Advocate (OPUC) 5. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT GSDJ DATED:1611212020 E s 1 t{ T4 rci J o (-) 0 4 JAI'I 2021 a i * c . :. P ORDER SA. No. 174 of 2007 DISMISSINC THE SECOND APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN / l,-) 2ro
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.