MANIPUR TRIBALS PIONEER ASSOCIATION v. State of Manipur and 4 others
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2025-05-04. MANIPUR TRIBALS PIONEER ASSOCIATION v. State of Manipur and 4 others. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
Item No. 25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(PIL) No. 17 of 2025 (Ref. : PIL No. 2 of 2023) Manipur Tribal Pioneer Association … Applicant - Versus - State of Manipur & 4 Ors. … Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D. KRISHNAKUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA O R D E R 05. 05. 2025 [D. Krishnakumar, CJ] [1] Heard Mr. L. Sevananda, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. H. Devendra, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State and Mr. W. Darakishwor, learned senior PCCG appearing for the Ministry. [2] The connected main case being PIL No. 2 of 2023 has been filed with the prayer for securing the construction of an Eklavya Model Residential School (EMRS) at Duibansui, Noney District, Manipur for the benefit of class of persons who are poor and ignorant of legal remedies residing in the areas of Duibansui (Noney) in particular and Noney District, Manipur as a whole. The aforesaid case came to be disposed of on 20. 10.
2023 with the liberty to the State respondents to consider the feasibility of relaxing the guidelines, in deserving cases. P a g e 1 | 2 [3] The present applicant filed a representation dated 11. 07. 2024 for establishment of Eklavya Model Residential School (EMRS) at Duibansui, Noney District, Manipur by relaxing as per the direction of the Division Bench of this High Court in PIL No. 2 of 2023. Since the respondents have not considered the representation, the present application has been filed before this Court. Law is well settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court where the main order has been disposed of, a miscellaneous application praying for the substantive relief is not maintainable. [4] Subsequently, the present application has been filed by the applicant seeking for fresh cause of action for relief of considering the representation which is devoid of merit and not connected with the earlier prayer as sought by the petitioner.
The application is only for modification or clerical error committed in the case. In such circumstances, the present application is not maintainable. [5] Accordingly, the present application is disposed of as not maintainable. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Bipin P a g e 2 | 2
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.