ARADHANA CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Court: High Court of Uttarakhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Uttarakhand judgment dated 2024-11-26. ARADHANA CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No. 806 of 2024 Aradhana Chaudhary and others …..... Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand …. …. Respondent Present:- Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate for the applicants appeared through video conferencing. Mr. M. A. Khan, AGA for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The applicants Aradhana Chaudhary, Vivek Chaudhary, Alpana Rathi and Prakash Veer Rathi seek anticipatory bail in FIR No. 707 OF 2024, dated 20. 08. 2024 under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 352, 74 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Manglaur, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. According to the FIR, on 12. 08. 2024 at 05:00 in the evening, the informant was going to her uncle’s house, the applicants shoved her and made remarks on her character. They also made remarks on the daughter of the informant. 4. State was required to file objections, but objections have not been filed. 5.
Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that all the parties are family members; instant case is counter blast of the FIR that was filed against the informant and others. 6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which, the applicants should be granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed. 7. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 8. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicants shall be enlarged on bail on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“the AO”) concerned. In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (ii) They shall cooperate with the investigation. (iii) The applicants shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court.
(iv) The applicants shall deposit their passports with the AO. The passports may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. If any of the applicant does not have passport, he/she shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO. (v) The applicants shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J. ) 26. 11. 2024 Sanjay Digitally signed by SANJAY KANOJIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, SANJAY 2. 5. 4. 20=e50e50b49596520698eff87e0a08bb d504686df4d1afc60f54a287831dec46fe, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26EEB7122ED0DD23233A255D D8EC450A84B515A087CAEFD1B3179A7DEAE KANOJIA 40699, cn=SANJAY KANOJIA Date: 2024. 11. 29 11:59:57 +05'30'
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.