RAGHUVEER v. LAXMI NARAYAN
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-22. RAGHUVEER v. LAXMI NARAYAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI nd ON THE 22 OF JANUARY, 2024 SECOND APPEAL No. 261 of 2002 BETWEEN:- 1. RAGHUVEER S/O LATE SHRI KANI RAM, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE PARWADHIA SADAK, TEHSIL HAZUR, DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. RANJIT S/O LATE SHRI KANI RAM, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE PARWADHIA SADAK, TEHSIL HAZUR, DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. SITA RAM S/O LATE SHRI KANI RAM, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE PARWADHIA SADAK, TEHSIL HAZUR, DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. MATHARI BAI W/O LATE SHRI KANI RAM, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE PARWADHIA SADAK, TEHSIL HAZUR, DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. KAVERI BAI D/O LATE SHRI KANI RAM R/O VILLAGE PARWADHIA SADAK, TEHSIL HAZUR, DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 6. GINDA BAI D/O LATE SHRI KANI RAM, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE PARWADHIA SADAK, TEHSIL HAZUR, DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 7.
MEWA BAI D/O LATE SHRI KANI RAM, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE PARWADHIA SADAK, TEHSIL HAZUR, DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 8. REKHA BAI D/O LATE SHRI KANI RAM, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE PARWADHIA SADAK, TEHSIL HAZUR, DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) Signature Not Verified Signed by: MONIKA Signing time: 1/25/2024 10:46:01 AM ..... APPELLANTS (NONE) AND 1. LAXMI NARAYAN S/O LATE SHRI SARDAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE PARWADIA SADAK TEHSIL HAZUR, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. BANSILAL S/O HIRALAL R/O VILLAGE PARWADIA SADAK, TEHSIL HUZOOR, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. GANGA RAM S/O HIRALAL R/O VILLAGE PARWADIA SADAK, TEHSIL HUZOOR, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. NANHOOLAL S/O SADA RAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE CHANDU KHEDI, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. JAMUNA PRASAD (EXPIRED) S/O SADA RAM R/O VILLAGE CHANDU KHEDI, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) .....
RESPONDENTS (NONE) This appeal coming on for final hearing this day, the court passed the following: ORDER No one appears for the appellants. Earlier also on 10/11/2016, no one had appeared on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants have lost their interest to prosecute this second appeal. The second appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. (RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI) JUDGE Signature Not Verified Signed by: MONIKA Signing time: 1/25/2024 10:46:01 AM m/- Signature Not Verified Signed by: MONIKA Signing time: 1/25/2024 10:46:01 AM
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.