Mohd. Azeem Ansari v. Syed Badar Mohiuddin
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SUJANA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-03-28. Mohd. Azeem Ansari v. Syed Badar Mohiuddin. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA APPEAL SUIT Nos:200 & 201 OF 2007 APPEAL SUIT Nos: 200 of 2007: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the C. P. C. , against the Decree and Judgment da1ed. 07. 02. 2007, passed in O. S. No. 73 of 2005, on the file of the Vl Additional Diskict and Session Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Vikarabad Between: Mohd. Azeem Ansari, S/o lMohd. Ayub Ansari, Age:50 years,Occ: Business R/o H. No 36/8, I\ILA Colony, Road No. 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad ... APPELLANT/4Ih DEFENDANT AND 1. T. Venkateswara Rao, S/o Veera Bhadra Rao,Age:48 years Occ:Business R/o H No 46/8' Vengalarao Nagar colonv' "oiliRttroNDENr/pLArNrFF 2. Syed Badar Mohiuddin, Age:53 years Occ: Private Service S/o Khaja Mohiuddin Rlo 9-4-7712613lB,Toli Chowki, Hyderabad. 3.
Syed Tasneem Mohiuddin, S/o Khaja Mohiuddin ,Age: 48 years Rlo 9-4-77 12613/8,Toli Chowki, Hyderabad. 4. Ivlohammed lsamail, S/o Mohd. Miskeen Age:70 years,Occ: Business R/o Nizam Colony,Toli Chowki, Hyderabad. 5. M/s E. B. Farms Ltd, Rep. by its Managing Director ,S. Q. Hussain,S/o S. T. Hussain, Age: 50 years, Occ: Business R/o Flat No. 305, Moghul Mascot, A. C. Guards, Hyderabad. (Respondent No. S is dismissed for default vide court order dated 25'04'2016) ... RES'. NDENTS/DEFENDANTS l. A. NO: 1 OF 2007(ASMP. NO: 783 OF 2007) '151 Petition under Section of C. P. C. , praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the decree and Judgment dated. 07. 02. 2007, of the trial Court in O. S. No. 73 of 2005, on the file of the Vl Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vikarabad. Counsel for the Appellant :SRl B. ADINARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 :SRl C. B.
RAM MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos 2 to 5:NONE ? APPEAL SUIT Nos: 20'l of 2007: g6 Appeal Suit filec under Section of the C. P. C. , against the I ecree and Judgment dated. 17. 02. 2007, passed in O. S. No. 9O of 2006, on the file of the Vl Additional District and Session Judge, Vrkarabad, Ranga Reddy Districr Between: lVlohd. Azeem Ansari, S/o t\Iohd. Ayub Ansari, Age: :i() years Occ:Business R/o H. No. 36/8, lvl LA Colony, Road No. 12, Banjara H llr; Hyderabad ... APPE I. LANT/1. t PLAINTIFF AND 1. Syed Badar Mohiuddin, S/o Khaja [t4ohiuddin, Age: 53 "ears,Occ. Private Service, Rlo 9-4-7712613/8, Toli Chowki, Hyderabad. 2. Syed Tasneem Mohiuddin, S/o Khaja Mohiuddin, Age 4ti years Rlo 9-4-7712613/8, Toli Chowki, Hyderabad. 3. Mohammed lsmail, S/o lt/lohd. [t/liskeen, Business R/o ltli;:am Colony, Toli Chowki, Hyderabad. 4. T. Venkateswara Rao, S/o Veera Bhadra Rao,Age;48 yerrrs. Business R/o H. No-46/8, Vengalarao Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. 5.
Narsa Reddy, Joint Registrar,Oio The district Registra- tlanga Reddy District, Regrstration Office, Moosapet, Hyderabad. ... RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS 6. Syed Qavr,ar Hussain, S/o Sri S. T. Hussain,Age:50 yean. R/o Flat No. 305,lVloghal ltlascot,A. C. Guards, Hyderabad. (Respondent No. S is not necessary party in this appeal and hence given up r ... RESPONI] ENTS/2"d PLAINTIFF l. A. NO: I OE 2007(ASMP. NO: 784 OF 2002) Petition filed under Section 151 of C. P. C. , praying thal n the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, thr; High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent herein not to alienale the property and or change the nature of the land by converting them into hous;e plots or otherwise in respect of the land of an extent ol ac. 17. 20 gts comolising of Ac. B. 3B gts in SY. No. 405 and Ac. 8. 22 gts in Sy. No. 4'16lAl\ of Appreddyguda H/o Kanakamamidi Village, Itiloinabad Mnadal, R. R. Dist-ir;t being the subject matter of O. S. No.
90 of 2006 on the file of the Vl Additio-rirl District & Sessions \,/lkarabad, Judge's Court, R. R. District . -:ral**t- ,z .. :;' /. Counsel for the Appellant :SRl B. ADINARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No. 4 :SRl C. B. RAM MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,2 & 3:NONE The Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT K' SUJ'\]! TA SMT. JUSTICE TIIE HONOURABLE and 2()L of 2OO.! , APPEAL SUIT Nos. 2OO COMMoN ORDER There was appellant's side on call No rt:presentation on lO even on 06 03'2025 'O3 '2025 no represelltation ' ' "'l'O3'2025' the' r:aption "for this day under Though tho mattcrs are listed on is no reprcsenlaLion' dismissal", there I for non are dismissc APPeal suits 2. Hencc, the prosecuLlOn if any' shall As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pendine' stand closed I;D/- A. V,S. PRASAD I]EPUTY REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, & Session s Judge's Court' Additional Distrlct t. The Cor.
rrt of the Vl ReddY District' Vlkarabad, Ranga )UCl ADINARAYANA RAO' Advocate [i') 2. One CC to SRl. B. RAM MOHAN REDDY' Advocat':' iOPUCI 3. One CC to SRI C. B. 4. Trvc CD CoPies Prt-pcsd/PSL HIGH COURT DATED:2810312025 I I I I i ,,.. ,,. -... -_. \ j . ii, -':,'i;n--:-... ,z', '' I '(: ,\ . r \- \' i li'i il 4 SEP ilm --- ! \ -{ , I I 'i I I JUDGMENT I I I I AS. Nos. 200 & 201 of 2007 I I I I I I I I I : i DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUITS FOR hION PROSECUTION ? L ffi g zq- \
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.