SHARAD KUMAR SONI & ORS v. CHHTELAL AGARWAL & ORS
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2026-08-19. SHARAD KUMAR SONI & ORS v. CHHTELAL AGARWAL & ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH th ON THE 15 OF DECEMBER, 2023 FIRST APPEAL No. 296 of 2003 BETWEEN:- 1 (a) SHARAD KUMAR SONI S/O LATE JAWAHARLAL SONI AGED 11 YEARS (b) SURAJ KUMAR SONI S/O LATE JAWAHARLAL SONI AGED 9 YEARS (c) SUDHIR KUMAR SONI S/O LATE JAWAHARLAL SONI AGED 6 YEARS (d) SANJAY KUMAR SONI S/O LATE JAWAHARLAL SONI AGED 4 YEARS (a) to (d) BEING MINOR THROUGH THEIR MOTHER SMT. KUSUM SONI (e) SMT. KUSUM SONI W/O LATE JAWAHARLAL SONI AGED 38 YEARS ALL R/O MOHALLA UPEHTI KALGA TEH. HUZUR, DISTT. REWA (M. P. ) 2. RAMESH CHAND KUMAR SONI S/O MOHANLAL SONI AGED 25 YEARS R/O TARHATI REWA 3 (a) MOHD. JAVED S/O LATE MOHD. HANIF AGED 14 YEARS (b) MOHD. ABID S/O LATE MOHD. HANIF AGED 12 YEARS (a) & (b) BEING MINOR THROUGH THEIR BEGUM JUBEDA (c) BEGUM JUBEDA W/O LATE MOHD. HANIF AGED 38 YEARS ALL R/O BEHIND MASJID TARHATI TEH. HUZUR DISTT. REWA (M. P. ) ..... APPELLANTS (NONE) AND CHHOTELAL AGRAWAL S/O KAMTA PRASAD AGRAWAL 2.
CHINTAMANI AGRAWAL S/O KP AGRAWAL 3. RAJENDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL S/O LATE KRISHNA SEWAK AGRAWAL AGED 36 YEARS Signature Not Verified Signed by: VINAY KUMAR Signing time: 19-12-2023 18:59:03 4. MOHANLAL AGRAWAL S/O LATE KRISHNA SEWAK AGRAWAL AGED 34 YEARS 5. KAILASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL S/O LATE KRISHNA SEWAK AGRAWAL AGED 32 YEARS 6. RADHELAL AGRAWAL S/O K. S. AGRAWAL AGED 30 YEARS 7. MUNNI DEVI AGRAWAL D/O K. S. AGRAWAL AGED 44 YEARS 8. PUSHPA DEVI AGRAWAL D/O K. S. AGRAWAL 9. MAYA DEVI AGRAWAL D/O K. S. AGRAWAL 10. SMT. RAM KALI AGRAWAL W/O LATE KRISHNA SEWAK AGRAWAL ALL R/O GARHA AZAD MARG GOGHAR TEH. HUZUR DISTT. REWA (M. P. ) ..... RESPONDENTS (SHRI ASHUTOSH TIWARI - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT No. 10) This appeal coming on for hearing this day, t h e court passed the following: ORDER None is appearing on behalf of the appellants today. Earlier on 08. 12. 2023 also none appeared on behalf of appellants. It seems that appellants are not interested in prosecuting this appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (HIRDESH) JUDGE vkv /- Signature Not Verified Signed by: VINAY KUMAR Signing time: 19-12-2023 18:59:03
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.