SATPAL SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY AGRAWAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Chhattisgarh judgment dated 2024-10-01. SATPAL SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
1 / 2 VIVEK RAWAT Digitally NAFR signed by VIVEK HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR RAWAT WPC No. 2275 of 2018 1 - Satpal Singh S/o Narendra Bhadraja Aged About 41 Years R/o Punjabi Colony, Besides Shanti Niketan College, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Pushpa Bhadraja W/o Satpal Singh Bhadraja Aged About 38 Years R/o Punjabi Colony, Besides Shanti Niketan College, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary through The Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Board Of Revenue Through The President, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Commissioner Bilaspur Bilaspur, Division, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgrh. 5 - Tahsildar Bilaspur District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Smt.
Rajni Guddi W/o Chandrashekhar Buddhi Raja R/o Punjabi Colony Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Chandra S/o Late Kismat Lal Bhadraja R/o Punjabi Colony Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Narendra Kumar Bhadraja S/o Late Kismat Lal Bhadraja R/o Punjabi Colony Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 9 - Vimla Rani Bhadraza W/o Narendra Bhadraza R/o Punjabi Colony Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioners : None. For the State/Respondents : Ms. Neeta Tulsani Thawani, P. L. No. 1, 3 to 5 For Respondents No. 6, 7 Shri Manoj Kumar Jaiswal, Advocate. and 9 For Respondent No. 8 Has already been died. 2 / 2 Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, J. Order/Judgment on Board 01. 10. 2024 1. No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioners even when the case is called in the fourth round of hearing. 2.
In the above circumstance, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this petition for non-prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE vivek
Source: High Court of Chhattisgarh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.