Skip to main content
LawSphereX

DR. JITENDRA ACHARYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Court: High Court of Rajasthan

Bench: DINESH MEHTA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-02-06. DR. JITENDRA ACHARYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[2025:RJ-JD:7631] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR (1) S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11228/2024 Dr. Jitendra Acharya S/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Acharya, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Acharyon Ka Chowk, Bikaner At Present Working As Senior Demonstrator, Sardar Patel College, Bikaner (Raj. ). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Commissioner, Rajasthan Medical Education, Office Address- Sethi Colony, Chikitsa Shikaha Bhawan, Jaipur. 3. National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test Pg Medical And Dental Admission / Counselling Board - 2024, S. m. s. Medical College Jaipur Through Its Chairman. ----Respondents Connected With (2) S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12447/2023 Dr. Jitendra Acharya S/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Acahrya, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Acharyon Ka Chowk, Bikaner. At Present Working As Senior Demonstrator, Sardar Patel College, Bikaner (Raj. ).

----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Directorate Of Medical Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Rajasthan Medical Education Society, Sethi Colony, Chikitsa Shiksha Bhawan, Jaipur. 3. Chairman, Neet Pg Medical And Dental Admission / Counseling Board - 2023, Ruhs, College Of Dental Science, Subhash Nagar, Behind T. b. Hospital, Jaipur. 4. Dr. Annu Gurjar D/o Shri Madan Lal, By Caste Gurjar, Through Chairman, Neet Pg Medical And Dental Admission / Conseling Board - 2023. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JD:7631] (2 of 2) [CW-11228/2024] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Kumar Augustine For Respondent(s) : - JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 06/02/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petitions have been rendered infructuous. 2. Dismissed accordingly. 3. The stay applications also stand dismissed. (DINESH MEHTA),J 65-66-akansha/-

Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.