ANIL KUMAR AND ANR v. STATE OF HP AND ORS
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2020-12-15. ANIL KUMAR AND ANR v. STATE OF HP AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 5492 of 2020 Decided on: December 15, 2020 _____________________________________________________________ Anil Kumar and another .... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. and others .. Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting ? _____________________________________________________________ For the petitioners Mr. R. L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondents Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore and Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocates General & Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Mr. Bhupender Thakur and Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocates General.
THROUGH VIDEO-CONFERENCING _____________________________________________________________ Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral) Instant petition has been filed for the grant of following relief(s): “(i) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondent authorities to permit private demarcation qua the land of the petitioners i. e. land measuring 0-6-13 bigha in Khasra No. 275/2023/1735, Khatauni No. 1067, Khata No. 789, situated in Phati Balh Kothi Maharaja, Tehsil and District Kullu, H. P. , by any retired revenue official within a time bound manner in view of the factum that the Respondent No. 3 has not carried the demarcation qua the land of the petitioners in accordance with law and Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment? . - 2 - Government land was counted towards the land of the petitioners. ” 2. Petitioners not only have an alternative but have an efficacious remedy available to them under the revenue law.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed, reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach appropriate revenue authorities, in accordance with law. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sandeep Sharma) Judge December 15, 2020 (Vikrant)
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.