AMIRULE LYNGDOH AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-12-22. AMIRULE LYNGDOH AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC010178942020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln. /2849/2020 AMIRULE LYNGDOH AND ANR S/O REJJAQ AHAMMAD, R/O VILL-BORGANG, P. O. -MARNAGAR, UMTHAM, P. S. -NONGPOH, DIST-RI-BHOI, MEGHALAYA, PIN-793102 2: AJNUR LYNGDOH S/O REJJAQ AHAMMAD R/O VILL-BORGANG P. O. -MARNAGAR UMTHAM P. S. -NONGPOH DIST-RI-BHOI MEGHALAYA PIN-79310 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR ORDER Date : 22-12-2020 Heard Mr. S. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. N. K. Kalita, Page No. # 2/2 learned Addl. P. P. , Assam appearing for the State respondent. By this petition under Section 439 Cr. P. C. , the petitioners, namely i) Amirule Lyngdoh and ii) Ajnur Lyngdoh have prayed for grant of bail in connection with Panbazar P. S. Case No.
595/2020 registered u/s 341/333/506 of the IPC. The case diary, as called for, is placed before the Court. Perusal of the case diary reveals prima facie incriminating material against the accused petitioners. The injury report shows that the injured sustained simple injury caused by blunt object. The accused petitioners are behind the bar for last 33 days (since 20. 11. 2020) and on the other hand, the investigation has also substantially progressed. Therefore, this Court is of the view that further detention of the accused petitioners may not be necessary in the interest of the ongoing investigation into the case. Accordingly, it is provided that each of the accused/petitioners, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M.
, Kamrup (M), Guwahati subject to the following conditions-i) That the accused/petitioners shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer as and when required; ii) That the accused/petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Police Officer or the Court; and iii) That the accused/petitioners shall refrain from committing any similar offences in future of which they are accused or suspected of commission. Return the case diary. This disposes off the bail application. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.