K. Bhaskar, S/o. Yakaiah, v. .The Government of India,
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bench: HARINATH.N
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment dated 2024-12-17. K. Bhaskar, S/o. Yakaiah, v. .The Government of India,. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY. THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT m HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH. N ■M. WRIT PETITION NO: 15997 OF 2014 Between: K. Bhaskar, S/o. Yakaiah, Aged about 37 years, Occ: Constable/GD, CISF No. 974210027, presently working at CISF Unit, NLC Neyveli, Chennai, Tamilnadu State. ... PETITIONER AND 1. The Government of India, Rep. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi. 2. The Central Industrial Security Force, Rep. by its Director General, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi. 3. The Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force, South Zone, Besant Road, Chennai, Tamilnadu State 4. The Deputy Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force, South Zone, Besant Road, Chennai, Tamilnadu State. 5. The Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force Visakhaptnam Port Trust, Visakhapatnam. ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 5*^ respondent in imposing the punishment vide proceedings No. V- 15014/CISFNPT/DISC/MAJ/KBR/2012/52/ dated 03. 03. 2012 and confirmed by the appellate authority's proceedings dated 25. 04. 2012 and revision authority's proceedings No. V-15014/L&R/SS/Rev/RS/2012 -398. dated 18. 10. 2012 is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and consequently direct the respondents to fix the pay of the petitioner with all consequential benefits. LA. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 1982.
4 OF 20141 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i - in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend operation of the Disciplinary Authority i e 5'^ respondent proceedings No. V15014/CISF/VPT/DISC/MAJ/KBR/2012/52/ dated 03. 03. 2012 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble CgTurt may deem fit and proper in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B. SHIVA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: G. ARUN SHOWRI(CENTRAL GOVT. COUSEL) The Court made the following; ORDER APHC010157552014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457] B^ (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH. N WRIT PETITION NO: 15997/2014 Between; ... PETITIONER K. Bhaskar, S/o. Yakaiah, AND ...
RESPONDENT(S) The Government Of India and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B SHIVA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): \ 1. G. ARUN SHOWRKCENTRAL GOVT. COUNSEL) The Court made the following Order: matter being listed under the caption for Despite the On earlier dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner. petitioner. occasions also, there was no representation for the Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. shall As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stand closed. SD/- K. KASIRAO ACHARi ASSiSTAN^EGISTRAR //true copy// /Section officer To, 1 one CC to Sri B. Shiva Kumar, Advocate [OPUCl 2. one CC to Sri G. Arun Showri(Central Govt, Couns 3. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:17/12/2024 ORDER WP. No. 15997 of 2014 ov m I 10 JAN 2025 «o/. - ^ . Current Section . ^ WITHOufcOSTs'^ '"' non-prosecution
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.