MAHENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-08-10. MAHENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:38004] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18602/2026 CNR: RJHC010787462026 | URN: CW / 32104U / 2026 Mahendra Kumar S/o Shankar Lal, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Vpo Malarampura, Tehsil Sangaria District Hanumangarh. At Present Chak 13 Kpd, Tehsil Chhattargarh District Bikaner. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Dy. Conservator Of Forest, Indira Gandhi Canal Project, Chhattargarh District Bikaner. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar (Revenue), Chhattargarh District Bikaner. 3. Murti Devi D/o Shankar Lal, Resident Of Chak 13 Kpd, Tehsil Chhattargarh District Bikaner. 4. Anusuiya D/o Shankar Lal, Resident Of Chak 13 Kpd, Tehsil Chhattargarh District Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. S. Choudhary. HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI Order 10/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner being aggrieved of the order dated 18. 05. 2011 (Annex.
11) passed by the District Collector, Bikaner, and the judgment dated 03. 02. 2026 (Annex. 12) passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Bikaner Division, Bikaner, has preferred a revision petition before the Board of the Revenue Ajmer, however, till date, the stay application filed along with the revision petition is still pending, [2026:RJ-JP:38004] (2 of 2) [CW-18602/2026] and on account of that the petitioner is suffering irreparable loss and grave hardship. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner thus makes a limited prayer that the Board of Revenue Ajmer may kindly be directed to decide the stay application filed along with the revision petition in an expeditious manner. 3. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the Board of Revenue Ajmer to decide the stay application filed along with the Revision Petition No. 4615/2026 titled as ‘Mahendra Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
’ expeditiously preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (DR. NUPUR BHATI),J 25/Sumit Sharma
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.