PRAMILA GOCHHAYAT v. STATE OF ODISHA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2025-12-16. PRAMILA GOCHHAYAT v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 34907 of 2025 Pramila Gochhayat ..... Petitioner Mr. A. P. Ray, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 16. 12. 2025 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed under the facts and circumstance of the case narrated above your Lordship would be graciously pleased to admit this writ petition. And Further be pleased to direct the opp. parties to regularise the work charged service of the petitioner in the post of sweeper or its equivalent post with all consequential service benefits as per law & Judgement passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jaggo vs.
Union of India and others, reported in 2024 SCC Online SC 3826, in Shripal and anr. vs. Nagar Nigam, Gaziabad (decided on 31 January, 2025) in Civil Appeal No. 8157 of 2024 & Civil Appeal No. 8158-8179 of 2024 & Secretary, State of Karnataka -v. - Uma Devi, reported in (2006) 4 SCC 1, as well as like Narusu Pradhan vrs. State in Ο. Α. No. 1189(c)/2006, affirmed in W. P. (c) No. 5377/2010 and in SLP(c) cc No. 22498/2012 by Hon'ble Supreme court and Chandra Nandi v. State of Orissa, order of Page 1 of 2. W. P. (C) No. 19550/2011 has been affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme court in order dt. 06. 05. 2022 in SLP(c) No. 21180/2021, for the ends of Justice. And further be pleased to direct the opp. Parties to decide the pending representation under Annexure-4, as per the rules regulations & verdicts of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India within a time frame. And further be pleased to issue writ(s), direction(s), order(s) as your lordships deem fit and proper for the ends of justice.
And for this Act of kindness the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray. ” 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No. 1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of her claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 1 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 1 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Jyoti Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 17-Dec-2025 17:49:43 Page 2 of 2.
Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.