SUBHASH v. SHRI M.S. DAWAR
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-02. SUBHASH v. SHRI M.S. DAWAR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA nd ON THE 2 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 CONTEMPT PETITION CIVIL No. 4118 of 2023 BETWEEN:- 1. SUBHASH S/O SHRI GANGADHAR SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER RETIRED R/O VILLAGE SINGUN TEHSIL KASRAWAD DISTT. KHARGONE (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. MANJUR HASAN S/O SHRI CHOTE KHAN, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER (REITRED) WARD NO. 4 DEHATI OHALLA BAGH DISTRICT DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. SHIVJ S/O SHRI HIRALAL PATIDAR, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER (RETIRED) MANGLA COLONY, TEHSIL MANAWAR DISTRICTDHAR (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. GANGARAM S/O SHRI MANGILAL, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER (RETIRED) HATAI CHOWK VILL LANGUR DISTRICT DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. SANTOSH S/O SHRI BABUSINGH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER (RETIRED) PATEL MOHALLA, DHARAMPURI DISTRICT DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH) 6.
JALAL S/O SHRI SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER (RETIRED) VILL. TIBADIYA TEHSIL MANAWAR DISTRICT DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH) 7. DAYARAM S/O SHRI KISHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER (RETIRED) VILL. RANDA TEHSIL MANAWAR DISTRICT DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONERS (BY SHRI MANISH YADAV - ADVOCATE) Signature Not Verified Signed by: JYOTI Signing time: 03-Feb-24 10:26:06 AM AND 1. SHRI M. S. DAWAR CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT TULSI NAGAR BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. P. K. VERMA CHIEF ENGINEER TAPTI KACHAR JALSANSADHAN VIBHAG DISTRICT INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. B. P. MEENA EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT MANAWAR DISTRICT DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI MANOJ MALVIYA - ADVOCATE FOR RESOPNDENT NO. 3. ) This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER This petition has been preferred alleging non-compliance of order dated 28. 09. 2022 passed in W. P. No.
21556 of 2022 whereby the representation of the petitioners was directed to be decided. 2. Reply has been filed by the respondents in which they have been stated that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and rejected by order dated 08. 01. 2024. 3. In view of the aforesaid, nothing further survives for determination in this petition which is accordingly disposed off reserving liberty to the petitioners to challenge the order dated 08. 01. 2024 in accordance with law. (PRANAY VERMA) JUDGE jyoti Signature Not Verified Signed by: JYOTI Signing time: 03-Feb-24 10:26:06 AM
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.