M/s.Aruha Enterprises v. M/s. Green Living Retailers Private Limited
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.LAKSHMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-17. M/s.Aruha Enterprises v. M/s. Green Living Retailers Private Limited. Read the judgment and...
Judgment text
13168I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENry SIX PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN ARBITRATION APPLICATI ON NO: 177 OF 202s Between: M/s. Aruha Enterprises, Rep. by its partner Smt. Aruna Regandla, FIat No. 302, Sai Sagar Samyuktha Residency, Road No. 4, Krushi Nagar, Bandlaguda, Nagole, Hyderabad 500068. - ... Applicant AND M/s. Green Living Retailers Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, 3d floor, CCT Space, T. S. No. 28t1l3l1, Sy. No. 403, MLA Cotony, Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana 500034. - ... Respondent Arbitration Application under Sub-secs (5 & 6) of section 11 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 read with para (3)(i)(c) of scheme for appointment of Arbitrators, 2006 praying that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to appoint an Arbitrator to resolve the issues between the applicant and the respondent. Counsel for the Applicant: Mr.
Bhaskar poluri Counsel for the Respondent: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER r+:!! Fqr@qal . /,/ ,,/ ---/ L IN TTIE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT: HYDEFIABAD HON,BLE SITI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN ARBITRAT ION APP LICA TION No. I 770 F 202s Date:I 7-04- 2026 Between: M/s Aruha Enrerprises Represented by dmt. Aruna Regangla Applicant And M/s Creen Living Retailers privare Limired Represented by its Managing Direcror, ... Respondent This Court passed rhe following:_ ORDER Heard Mr. Bhasker poluri, leamed counsel for the applicant Notice sent to the respondent is returned unserved with an endorsement "Addressee left without instructions,,. Sending notice ro respondent to the address availabre is sufficienl sen'ice in terms of Section 27 0f the General Clauses Act, 1g97. None appears on behalfofthe respondent. 2. The present Arbitration Application is filed under Section l l (5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996(hereinafter . the .
E : Act, 1996') for appointment of Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties 3' Both the appricant and the respondent have entered into a Franchise Agreement with Sustainkaft, dated o4. rr. 2o2z. Thereafter, disputes arose between the applicant and the respondent with regard to the execution of the said agreement, dated 04. 1 I . 2022. 4. Clause No. l5 of the said agreement deals with arbitration and the same is extracted below:- l5. Arb rtration: Any dispute/s or differencc/s rvlratsoevcr arising under or in connection with this Agreement which couldn't be settled by the both parties through negotiations, shall be settled by arbitration irr accordance with the Arbitration and Conciliation Acr, 1996. All proceedings shall be conducted in English and the proceeding shall be conductcd by a solc arbilraror appointed mutually by i I both parties. Venue lor arbitration shall be in Hyderabad, tndia. 5.
While so, the respondent unilateraily cancelled the tanchise agreement vide legal notice dated 01. 06. 2023. The Applicant issued reply dated 20. 06. 2023 requesting the respondent to come forward to resolve the disputes through Arbitrator and proposed Sri V. V. Raghavan, as an arbitrator. But the respondent did not r. espond. l disputes between that there are facts would reveal 6. The aforesaid execution of the with regard to the and the respondent the applicant The same are dated 04 'll '2022' Franchise Agreement vvith Sutainkart' arbitrable in nature the present Arbitration of the aforesaid discussion' 7. In the light Retired District Sri T'Raghuram' is allowed' Accordingly' Application Residency' Shyamlal Buildings' 4tr'Floor' Kishan Judge, Flat No. 402, as sole is appointed Mobilc No'9704377419' Begumpet, Hyderabad, parties are the parties' The adjudicate the disputes between Arbitrator to before the learned and defences atl the available pleas at liberty to take sole Arbitrator.
pending if anY, in this miscellaneous Petitions' Consequently, shall stand closed' Arbitration Application, Sd/. M. VIJAYA BHASKER' JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTTON OFFICER To, o. 4o2, 4t' Floor, Kishan 1 Sri T. Raghuram, Retired District Judge, Flat Mobile Residency, Buildings, Begumpet, Hyderabad, ShYamlal with a copy of affidavit No. 9704377419. (By Special Messenger)(Along and material paPers) 2. One CC to Mr, Bhasker Poluri, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies KAM/BA u :. *d - HIGH COURT DATED: 1710412026 f THE S /\ li. ) I'J P l) 5 ilAY - 0 426 /? ORDER t ARBAPPL. No. 177 ot 2025 i . ,l ALLOWING THE ARBITRATION APPLICATION /
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.