SHEO RANJAN PRASAD ALIAS SHIV RANJAN PRASAD v. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH C B I
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-01-18. SHEO RANJAN PRASAD ALIAS SHIV RANJAN PRASAD v. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH C B I. Read the judgment and...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 2167 of 2019 SheoRanjan Prasad @ Shiv Ranjan Prasad, aged about 56 years, S/o Late Jwala Prasad, R/o Village-Uchta, PO- Sakurabad, PS- Kurtha, District- Jehanabad (Bihar), at present residing at Bandhu Nagar, BirsaChowk, P. O & P. S. - Jagannathpur, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) … … Petitioner Versus Union of India through CBI … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- 05/18. 01. 2020 1. Heard Mr. Nikhil Kumar Mehta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 2. This petition has been filed for the following reliefs: - “The impugned order dated 21. 06. 2019 passed by the learned ShriA. K. Mishra Special Judge, CBI Cases, Ranchi in Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. 629/2019, arising from R. C. 02(A)/2018-R (whereby the petitioner’s application under section 205 Cr. P. C.
has been rejected), be set aside and quashed, appropriate orders may kindly be passed for dispensing with personal appearance of the petitioner U/s 205 Cr. P. C. in the aforesaid case bearing R. c. 02 (A)/2018-R pending in the court of the learned Shri A K Mishra Special Judge, CBI Cases, Ranchi. ” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. He submits that withdrawal of this petition will not prejudice the case of the petitioner in any manner before the learned court below. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-C. B. I. has no objection to the prayer made for withdrawal of this petition. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. 6. It is further observed that dismissal of this petition will not prejudice the case of either parties in any manner before the learned court below. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 8. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, are also dismissed as not pressed. 9.
Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court below through ‘FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J. ) Mukul
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.