Sirasala Guravaiah v. State of Telangana and 6 others
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: P NAVEEN RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-17. Sirasala Guravaiah v. State of Telangana and 6 others. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO wRlT PET|TION NO. 22772 0F 2020 Between: Sirasala Guravaiah, S/o. Ramaiah, aged about 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Damarcharla Village, Damarcharla lr,4andal, Nalgonda District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 3 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District. 4 The Station House Officer, Wadapalli Police Station, Damarcharla lt4andal, Nalgonda District Vempati Anjaneyulu @ Veeranja Neyulu, S/o. S/o Satyanarayana, aged about 55 years, Occ. Business, R/o Damarcharla Village and l\/andal, Nagonda District. 6 Anipi Reddy Padma, W/o. Sidi Reddy, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o.
Damarcharla Village and lvlandal, Nagonda District. 7 Anipi Reddy Saidireddy, S/o. Somireddy, aged about 45 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Damarcharla Village and lt4andal, Nagonda District. ,.. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No. 4 in non-reg istratio n of FIR against the respondent No. 5 to 7 being on the complaint dated 12. 11. 2020 lodged by the petitioner is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutio na l, violation principles of natural lustice and also in violation of Articles 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 , and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent No. 4 to register the FIR against the respondent No. 5 to 7 basing on the complaint dated 12. 11. 2020 lodged by the petitioner.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 4 to register lhe FIR against the respondent No. 5 to 7 basing on the complaint dated 1211112020 lodged by the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. s to 7: -- The Court made the following: ORDER -2 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO U/RIT PETITION No. 22772 OF 2O2O ORDER: Learned counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy. 2. Granting said liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as n,ithdrawn. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed SD/. CH. VENKATESWAR ASSISTANT EGI I I //TRUE COPY// SECTIO OFFICER To, 1.
One CC to Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, Advocate tOPU]fl relansana H";;, corrt ioitne State of at Hyderabad i. i;; 6ci-t" cp i[i iig'ri touTl 3. Two CD CoPies. MP qr'/ HIGH COURT DATED:1711212020 1 HE I414: ( c o I ia 2 4 DEC 20 a \ >- ORDER tz. . ) . l: WP. No. 22772 of 2020 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS ssJ. . 5c-ct;e-l l- $\,{--*o
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.