DILIP AGARWAL v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-11-26. DILIP AGARWAL v. THE STATE OF ASSAM. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC010138102020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2874/2020 DILIP AGARWAL S/O LATE SHYAM SUNDER AGARWAL, R/O BARA BAZAR, SHILLONG, P. S. - 29 CANTONMENT, DIST-EAST KHASI HILLS, MEGHALAYA, PIN-793002 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M GARODIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA ORDER Date : 26. 11. 2020. Heard Mr. M. Garodia, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. B. Gogoi, the learned Additional PP, Assam, who has produced the case diary of CID PS Case No. 86/2012 under Section 120(B) IPC r/w Section 7(1) of the E. C. Act. By this application under Section 438 of the Cr. P. C. , the petitioner, namely, Dilip Agarwal, is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with CID PS Case No. 86/2012 under Section 120(B) Page No. # 2/2 IPC r/w Section 7(1) of the E. C. Act.
I have perused the case diary and the statements more specifically of the driver, namely, Munin Deka. From the statements, I am satisfied to grant the pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. In the event of arrest of the petitioner above named, in connection with the case aforementioned, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with a suitable surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of arresting authority.
The pre-arrest bail is granted on the following conditions: (1) The petitioner shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the aforesaid police station, without prior written permission from its office-in-charge, (2) The petitioner shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case, (3) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer, (4) The petitioner shall appear before the Officer-in-charge CID PS within 7(seven) days from today. (5) The petitioner shall continue to appear before the Investigating Officer of the above mentioned case after every 10(ten) days from the date of first appearance till such time the attendance is dispensed with by the said investigating officer. Send back the case diary. This bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.