Bantu Buchibabu v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.LAKSHMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-11-10. Bantu Buchibabu v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVE|\ilBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K, LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4907 OF 2020 Betwee n: 1. Bantu Buchibabu, S/o lVangaiah Aged 52 years, Occ. Advocate, R/o Ramchandragudem of lViryalaguda Town, Nalgonda District 2. Bantu Swathi, D/o Bantu Buchibabu Aged about 27 yearc, Occ. House Wife, R/o Miryalaguda Town, Nalgonda Dlstrict ... Petitioner/Accused No. 1 and 2 AND 1. The State of Telangana, represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature, at Hyderabad, State of Telangana 2. Regatti Narayana Reddy, S/o chrna Linga Reddy, Aged about 60 years, Occ Farmer, 12lo Vemulapally, Nalgonda District ... RespondenUComplainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l\,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No.
183 of 2020 of Police Station Miryalaguda ll- Town. l. A. NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Sectjon 482 of Cr. P. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Crime No. '183/2020 of Police Station lViryalaguda ll- Town, including arrest of the Petitioner, pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri L. Preetham Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION No. 49O7 OF 2O2O ORDER: Sri Rapolu Bhakar, learned counsel for the petitioners, sought permission of this Court to r,,"'ithdralv the Criminal Petition.
He has also filed a letter dated 05. 1 1. 2020 before the Registry to that effect. Permission is accorded and the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. I SD/. B. SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTBAR \, ,TRUE COPY// r)t SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Judicial First Class Magistrate, at l\/iryalguda, Nalgonda District. 2. The Station House Officer, tt4iryalaguda ll-Town Police Station, Nalgonda District. 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 4, One CC to Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, Advocate IOPUC] 5. One CC to Sri L. Preetham Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies I\IIVK )x\l HIGH COURT KLJ DATED:1011112020 \ ,/Q c o o 20 Nov 2020 i l ORDER |l. CRLP. No. 4907 ot 2020 / L DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS WITHDRAWN fa \zo \ \-'11\ 2o'AxY . -\
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.