SRI DR RATHNRAJ K J v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-21. SRI DR RATHNRAJ K J v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 672 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ST DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. R. KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 672 OF 2013 (S-PRO) BETWEEN: SRI DR RATHNRAJ K J S/O K JANARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS SELECTION GRADE LECTURER DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, B. M. S. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, BULL TEMPLE ROAD, BANGALORE R/AT 139, 1ST FLOOR, MUDALIAR STREET, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE- 560 004 …PETITIONER Digitally signed (BY SRI. C. S. DWARAKANATH, ADVOCATE AND by SHARADAVANI B SRI. GURUPRASAD B. R. , ADVOCATE) Location: High Court of Karnataka AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, M. S BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-01 2. THE B. M. S. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL, - 2 - WP No. 672 of 2013 P. B. NO. 1908, BANGALORE-560 001 3. THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, M.
S BUIDLINGS, BANGALORE-01 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHY HEGDE, AGA FOR R1 AND R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DT. 31. 10. 12 MARKED AT ANN-G, ISSUED BY THE R3 DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION BANGALORE, HAS THE SAME IS ILLEGAL MALAFIDE & UNREASONABLE. DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PROMOTE THE PETITIONER TO THE CADRE OF ASST. PROFESSOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH PRE-AMENDED RULES OF RECRUITMENT & TO GRANTING ALL THE CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS. POST THIS WP FOR PRLY. HG. BEFORE SINGLE JUDGE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. R. KRISHNA KUMAR - 3 - WP No. 672 of 2013 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal, which reads as under: "The above named petitioner most respectfully submits that he does not want to prosecute the above matter and wants to withdraw the same.
Wherefore it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above petition as withdrawn, in the interest of justice ". 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S. R. KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE VS List No. : 1 Sl No. : 39
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.