P.Pullamma, W/o. G.Chandra Sekhar Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bench: V.SUJATHA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment dated 2024-10-19. P.Pullamma, W/o. G.Chandra Sekhar Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
Cl. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR ^ O V * A PRESENT % m THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE V. SUJATHA Oi WRIT PETITION NO: 9887 OF 2niR Between: P. Pullamma, W/o. G. Chandra Sekhar Reddy, Hindu, aged 34 years, Occ; Anganwadi Worker, Anganwadi Center-2, Konededu Village, Panyam Mandal, Kurnool District. ... PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Its Principal Secretary, Women & Child Welfare Department, Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The Child Development Project Officer (CDPO), ICDS Project, Nandyal Rural, Kurnool District. 3. The Project Director, DW & CAD, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 4. The District Collector, Kurnool District, Kurnool. ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the impugned proceedings R. C. B/25-Sup-4/2014, dated: 27. 12. 2015 issued by the 4th if respondent as illegal, null and void and consequently directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service as Anganwadi Worker- 2, Konidedu Village, Panyam Mandal, Kurnool District with all consequential benefits without conducting proper enquiry and opportunity is as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and subversive of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. I. A. NO: 1 OF 2016rWPMP.
NO: 12481 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service as Anganwadi Worker-2, Konidedu Village, Panyam Mandal, Kurnool District with all consequential benefits, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI M SOLOMON RAJU Counsel for the Respondents No. 1 to 4: GP FOR WOMEN DEV-CHILD ^ WELFARE The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010332802016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333] (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V. SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 9887/2016 Between: P. pullamma, W/o. G. chandra Sekhar Reddy ... PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ... RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M SOLOMON RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1 .
GP FOR WOMEN DEV-CHILD WELFARE(AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: was no Earlier, when the matter was taken on 17. 10. 2024, there representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was posted to 19. 10. 2024, under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Today, when the matter was called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in the present case. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in the Writ Petition, shall also stand closed. Sd/- K. J. RAJA BABU //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To 1. One CC to SRI. M. SOLOMON RAJU, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR WOMEN DEV-CHILD WELFARE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three C. D. Copies nm p ^51 HIGH COURT DATED: 19/10/2024 ORDER WP. No. 9887 of 2016 oV * 2 1 NOV ? 0? ‘i ^ . Current Section . ^ DISMISSING THE WP FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
Source: High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.