LawSphereX

Avula Ravinder Reddy v. Madi Reddy Yugender Reddy

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO,ALOK ARADHE

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-11-26. Avula Ravinder Reddy v. Madi Reddy Yugender Reddy. Read the judgment and case details on...

Judgment text

3418 ] [ HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO WRIT APP EAL NO: 1329 0F 2024 Against order Dated of the Letters Patent Preferred writ Appeal under clause 15 passed 26454 ol on fite of the High court. 02rc5hb24 in. wp No 2024 the Between: Reddy, Aged about 36-y-ears' Occ Avula Ravinder Reddy, S/o Venkatram R/o 6107t2' Vinavak i;"riiitii, biri. ion r. to'izo Batanisar H No Qorpgrq[91, irrrgli, Bitir"sar Mandal, Kukatpa-ily, Medchal-Malkajgiri District' ... APPELLANT AND 47 S/o1t/adi Reddy 1. Madi Reddy Yugender Reddy' \aOlneAly, fge^d-about Manoar' Fl/o H No 1058/1 tsalanagar vears, Occ Business, 'Ferozguda, i/edchal-Malkajgiri District. Occ Business, Ranjanna, Aoed about 35 vears, 2. Akula Narendar, S/o Akula N"agar, Balanalar Mandal, Medchal Rl/o H No 6'1 428, Balanagar,Chittaram Malkajgiri District. 3.

The State of Telangana, Rep by its PrinciPal Secretary Municipal -riat B arild Aa;. dil"rion ino"u rodn d-5ve'topment, Secreta ing at Hyderabad. 4. TheGreaterHyderabadMunicipalCorporation,Commissioner"OfficeatCC Cot"pf"i i"n( Bund Road, Lower Tankbund, Hyderabad AGI 5. The Zonal commissioner, Kukatpally Zone, Office at Janatha Nagar District' colony, Moosapet, Medchal-Malkaigiri No 24' Kukatpally Zone' 6. The Ddputy Commissioner, Kukatpally Circle Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 7. The Deputy Commissioner, Moosapet Circle No 23, TS bpass Nodal Officer Kukatpally zone GHMC. Planning, Section Circle No 24' Kukatpally B. The Assistant City Planner Town - District Oivision 120 Kukitpally,Medchal-Malkajgiri ,.. RESPONDENTS lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may ce pleased to suspend the order dated 2510912024 in the W. P. NO. 26454 of 2O24 Counsel for the Appellant: SRl.

E VENKATA SIDDHARTHA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1&2: -- Counsel forthe Respondent No. 3: SRI E. VENKATA REDDY cp FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 to 8: SRI M. DHANANJAY REDDy SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: JUDGMENT "7 THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALO K ARADHE AND THE HON SRI JUSTICE J. RAO 'BLE WRIT APPEAL No. 1329 of2024 Juslbe Arudhe) JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble tte Chtel Alok for the Mr. E. Venkata Siddhartha, learned counsel appellant. Government Pleader Mr. E. Venkata Reddy, learned & Urban Development for Municipal Administration Depa-rtment for the respondent No'3' Standing Counsel Mr. M. Dhananjay Reddy, Iearned for the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation for the respondents No. 4 to 8. 2. Heard on the question of admission' I 3. In this intra court appeal, the appellant has assailed I I I passed order dated 25'09'2O24 the validity of the interim in W. P'No.

26454 of 2024 ' by the learned Single of liling an appellant has the remedy 4. Admittedly, the order' of the a-foresaid interim application seeking vacation Instead of resorting to the remedy of fiting an application seeking vacation of the interim order, the appellant has filed this appeal. 5. The order impugned in this appeal is an interim order. Therefore, we are not inclined to examine the validity of the interim order. However, the appellarrt is granted the liberty to move al application seeking vaciltion of the aforesaid interim order. Needless to state thirt in case such an application is filed, the learned Single Judge shail deal with the application expeditiously. 6. Accordingly, the writ appeal is disposed of' Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to crrsts sD/- N. CHANORA SEKHAR EAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE coPY// sEcrtoN ciFrrcen To, and Urban development' 1.

The PrinciP al Secretary Municipal Administration HYd erabad. Secretariat Building at MuniciP al Corpo ration, Commissioner, , Cffice at CC 2. The Greater HYd erabad r Tankbund, Hyderabad und Road, Lowe Complex, Tank B tha Nagar AGI KukatPallY Zone, Office at Jana 3. The Zonal commi ssioner, ri District Medchal-Malkajgi colony, MoosaPet, Zone, No 24, KukatPallY KukatPa lly Circle 4. The Deputy Comm issioner, District Medchal-Malkajgiri Officer Moosapet Circle No 23, TS bpass Nodal 5. The DePutY Commissioner' KukatpallY zo ne GHMC. 24' Kukatpally Plann erTown Planning, Section Circle No 6. The Assistant CitY District Division 1 20 Kukatpally, Medchal-Malkajgiri 7. One CC to SRl. E VEN KATA SIDDHARTHA Advocate tOPUCI SC FOR GHMC [OPUC] SRI M. DHA NANJAY REDDY 8. One CC to ent, High for MuniciP al Administration and Urban DeveloPm 9. Two CCs to GP Court for the State of Telang ana at Hyderaba d. [ouI] 10. Two CD Copies CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED:2611112024 tle SIA J () (-l 2 6 l{rii ? C?

{ p = JUDGMENT ,] (:'. 'r pAl ^,,I WA. No. 1329 ot 2024 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \'-) )e W

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.