Ravi Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE R. P. MISHRA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2025-12-15. Ravi Kumar v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 86266 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -57 Year-2025 Thana- Bhittha District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Ravi Kumar S/O Pavan Kumar Thakur R/O Village- Kamtaul Court Patti, Ward No. 3, P. S- Kamtaul, Distt. - Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mazharul Hassan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Sucheta Yadav, A. P. P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 15-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhittha P. S. Case No. 57 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3.
The prosecution case, in short, is that total 288 liters of country made liquor was recovered from car. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The name of the petitioner has transpired as being owner of the vehicle in question and he has no knowledge regarding the goods loaded Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 86266 of 2025(2) dt. 15-12-2025 2/2 on the vehicle. The petitioner is in custody since 09. 10. 2025 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bhittha P. S. Case No. 57 of 2025. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.