MUKESH SINGH BOHRA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Court: High Court of Uttarakhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Uttarakhand judgment dated 2024-12-18. MUKESH SINGH BOHRA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1251 of 2024 Mukesh Singh Bohra …..... Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …. …. Respondent Present:- Ms. Sangeeta Adhikari Patni, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Virendra Singh Rawat, AGA for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The applicant seeks anticipatory bail in Criminal Case No. 2832 of 2024, State vs. Mukesh Singh Bohra, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal, which is based on FIR/Case Crime No. 257 of 2023, dated 21. 12. 2023, under Section 420, 120-B IPC and Section 66D of Information Technology Act, 2000, Police Station Kotwali Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued that the applicant was served Notice under Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and now, charge-sheet has been filed. 4.
Learned State counsel would submit that no separate objection is required to be filed, as such. The anticipatory bail application may be decided based on the material available on record. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which, the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 7. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (ii) The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court. (iii) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the court concerned.
The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. If the applicant does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO. (iv) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on (i) & (ii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J. ) 18. 12. 2024 Sanjay Digitally signed by SANJAY KANOJIA SANJAY DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OFUTTARAKHAND,2. 5. 4. 20=e50e50b49596520698eff87e0a08bbd504686df4d1afc60f5 4a287831dec46fe, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND,serialNumber=26EEB7122ED0DD23233A255DD8EC450A84B515A0 KANOJIA 87CAEFD1B3179A7DEAE40699, cn=SANJAY KANOJIADate: 2024. 12. 19 18:01:18 +05'30'
Source: High Court of Uttarakhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.