Yemmani Prasanna Kumar, v. The State of Telangana, Through Station House Officer, P.S. Madhapur,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-27. Yemmani Prasanna Kumar, v. The State of Telangana, Through Station House Officer, P.S....
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5639 OF 2026 Between: Yemmani Prasanna Kumar, S/o. Yemmani Elisha, Age. 33 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, Permanenl Resident of Flat No. 403, Plot No. 509, Lakshmi Residency, Gayatri Nagar, Allapur, Hyderabad - 500018 .. Petitioner/Accused No. 1 AND The State of Telangana, Through Station House Officer, P. S. Madhapur, Cyberabad Commissionerate. Rep. by Public Prosecutor ... RespondenUDe-facto Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the petitioner/Accused No. 'l in Cr. No. 1167/2025 on the file of P. S. Madhapur, Cyberabad (originally registered as Crime No . 1342 o1'2025 at P. S. Gachibowli).
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri A. Mukund Raj Gokul, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Mr. Jithendar Rao Veeramalla, Additional public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the foltowing: OROER IN THE HIGH COU RT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5639 of 2026 Date:27. 04. 2026 Between Yernmani Prasanna Kumar ... Petitioner/accused No. I AND The State ol'l'elangana and another .. Respondents ORDER This Criminal Petition has been tiled seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR. No. 1167 of 2025 (original Crime No. 1342 of 2025 of Ganchibowli Police Station) ol Madhapur Policc Station, Cyberabad, wherein lhe petitioner was arrayed as accused No. l for the olfences punishable under Sections 69 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 (for short 'BNS'). 2. Heard Mr. A.
Mukund Raj Gokul, leamed counsel lor the petitioner and Mr. Jithendar Rao Veerarnalla, leamed Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No' I ' 3. During the course of hearing' the leamed Additional Public Prosecutor, basing upon the written instructions dated 15 04 '2026 fumished by the Sub-lnspector of Police, Madhapur Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, submitted that lnvestigating Olficer after concluding the investigation referred as the matter as 'False' on 26. 03. 2026 as per the proceedings of ACP,, Madhapur Division and to that eflect a fited final report before the learned X Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the leamed trial Court is not taking steps pursuant to the final report filed by the Investigating Officer and requested this Court to issue necessary directions to the leamed trial Courl pursuant to the final final report filed by the lnvestigating Officer. 5.
Learned Additionat Public Prosecutor has not opposed the submission made by the leamed counsel for the petitioner. 6. Having considered the rival submissions made by the respect parties, this Court is of the considered view that even according to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, rhe Investigating Officer referred the matter as 'false' on 26. 03. 2026 and filed final report before the trial Court, The only grievance of the leamed counsel / / for the petitioner is that the trial Court is not taking steps pursuant to the final report filed by the lnvestigating Officer. 7. Taking into consideration the peculiar lacts and circumstances of the case, leamed X Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally, is directed to take appropriate steps pursuant to the final report filed by the lnvestigating Officer in accordance with larv preferably within a period of three (3) rnonths from the date of receipt of a copy oI this ordcr 8.
Accordingly, rhe Criminal Petition is disposed oL Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closecl Sd/. NAYANI CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// oFFrcER $ecrroru To, '1 . The X Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad ukatpally 2. The Station House Officer, Madhapur Police Station, Cyberabad. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad (OUT) 4. One CC to Sri A. Mukund Raj Gokul, Advocate IOPUC] 5. Two CD Copies '/\ DUBA rcv{ \_> HIGH COURT DATED: 2710412026 Tt{E s ( 0 4 l'lAY z 202$ ORDER 9. , . v . \ ,k CRLP. No. 5639 of 2026 5s. ". ,-rr4'r JT: DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION t O\)
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.